Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/01/2011 3:11:56 AM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Kaslin
Investing in a specific green energy company is like investing in a specific dot-com back in the 1990's. If the Clinton Administration had bet on dot-coms the way Obama does on loser green energy and other spending programs, we could have gone bankrupt a long time ago.

It's too bad that Obama's got a spending problem instead of being like Clinton who had a woman problem. Hey Barry, keep it in your wallet.

2 posted on 10/01/2011 3:31:58 AM PDT by Bernard (When the only Problem is overspending, all the Solutions look like TAX INCREASES to liberals...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin

Green energy = forced wealth transfer from tax payers to democrat donors.

Reward your friends.

That is all it is.


3 posted on 10/01/2011 3:36:39 AM PDT by chris37 (Heartless.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
"The surest way to guarantee that America gets its fair share of (green) business ... would be to enact a comprehensive energy strategy that raised the price of older, dirtier fuels."

Additional taxes on gas, oil, coal and nuclear power will be a boon for the economy... of China and India.

What in the hell can these people possibly be thinking?

To them it's all about wealth redistribution, and anything that aids that goal is to be promoted.

4 posted on 10/01/2011 4:37:37 AM PDT by USS Alaska
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
But the windmills couldn't deliver enough energy to make a profit. So Pickens folded and put the wind deal up for sale.

This is a HIGHLY overlooked factor in the eternal discussion of wealth distribution and the 'evil' super rich. If the government follows the socialist / communist philosophy of leveling / equalizing wealth then innovation DIES!

Pickens, a largely self-made billionaire, has enough wealth to try an idea and then to drop it when it does not work. Since it is his own money, he has little restrictions on going elsewhere. This is conceptualized in economics under the term "Free Capital". It is inclusive of time, labor and money and has in our lifetimes resulted in Apple, Microsoft and other such 'garage' endeavors.

This case of Solyndra shows what happens when a government intervenes. To my mind the absolute key factor was the fact that the "loan guarantees" were tax dollars and no one person was personally invested in the proper use of these dollars. When it is "other people's money" it is an abstraction and for the bureaucrat there is probably no penalty for failure and there is always more money in the pot.

6 posted on 10/01/2011 6:17:51 AM PDT by SES1066 (1776 to 2011, 235 years and counting in the GRAND EXPERIMENT!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Kaslin
The Gov’ts ONLY power is to tax and regulate....Hence the only way gov’t can push any technology is to tax and regulate the existing one so much that “Free Enterprise” will fill the void....
You want green energy?.....put a $5 tax on a gallon of gas and we'll have green Technology coming out of our ears...
7 posted on 10/01/2011 6:51:16 AM PDT by M-cubed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson