So it’s your position that a creditable explanation for any exceedingly complex situation can’t possibly admit more than one contributing factor? If X is to blame, Y is flawless? Anything else is “rambling”?
Don’t liberal-argue me, pal. It’s not a credible explanation.
I’ve studied this in significantly more depth than this type of handwaving argument and can point you in a dozen directions to sources much closer to the original actors, none of whom have single topic disease.