Why the GOP should embrace Mitt Romney (Barf Alert!!!)

Rick Perry isn't up to the job. Chris Christie isn't coming to the rescue. Republicans must accept that the candidate they want is right in front of them

David Frum Why the GOP should embrace Mitt Romney Rick Perry isn't up to the job. Chris Christie isn't coming to the rescue. Republicans must accept that the candidate they want is right in front of them posted on September 28, 2011, at 4:28 PM David Frum recent columns

Is Obama's defense of Israel too little, too late? We can't blame the poor for America's poverty problem What a union 'take out' looks like

Attention, Chris Christie fans. If you are looking for a Republican nominee who could actually do the job of president, who does not repel independent voters, who can survive a 90-minute debate without saying anything foolish, why the hell not Mitt Romney?

For three years, Republican activists, strategists, and donors have tried to find a plausible alternative to Romney, and again and again they have failed. For about 15 minutes, that alternative seemed at last to have materialized in the form of Texas Gov. Rick Perry.

Perry still leads the national polls and is still raising money. Yet it's hard to miss the loud hiss of air escaping this particular balloon.

So maybe it's time to reconsider the long-standing frontrunner — the candidate who was more than conservative enough for party conservatives back in 2008 — and to rediscover his good points.

1) Given the dreadful economic conditions, the Democrats will have no choice in 2012 but to run a negative campaign against the Republican alternative. Message: "We may have disappointed you on jobs, but they will take away your Medicare, Social Security, and unemployment insurance."

Of all the Republicans in the field, Romney is least vulnerable to this line of attack. He did not associate himself with the Ryan plan to withdraw the Medicare guarantee from people under age 55. He did not denounce Social Security as a "monstrous lie." He has not condemned the unemployed as layabouts.

Yes, Romney has vulnerabilities of his own in a general election, plenty of them. But at least he is not adding more. Perry, on the other hand, generates new raw material for Democratic attack ads almost every time he opens his mouth.

2) After the campaign comes the presidency. Who can believe that Rick Perry has the wherewithal to do that job? The global financial crisis still rages about us. Just ahead: Debt defaults in Europe. After that? Perhaps the popping of China's real-estate bubble. What else? Who knows?

The person you want in that job in such a time is someone with a deep understanding of finance and economics. The U.S. is paying dearly now for electing in 2008 a president who lacked such understanding, despite many other fine qualities. As a result (as Ron Suskind now reports), economic decision-making in the Obama White House degenerated into a struggle between advisers to sway a more or less passive president.

Romney spent much of his career in financial markets. One benefit of that experience: He is less likely to be overawed by possibly self-interested actors than a less familiar president. The U.S. has had quite enough of that.

3) Mitt Romney is the Republican candidate best positioned to respond effectively to the challenge bequeathed by Barack Obama's health-care reform.

Tea Party Republicans talk loosely of repealing the Affordable Care Act. That's not so easy for three reasons:

i) It will take 60 votes in the Senate to repeal, and Republicans are unlikely to have them;

ii) Important parts of the Affordable Care Act are very popular, and repealing them will trigger intense opposition;

iii) Private health insurance costs are exploding again, and plain repeal of ACA will expose more Americans to the full impact of those costs — which they won't like.

There are deals to be done to fix its worst problems (the financing mechanism, the additional Medicaid burdens on states, the lack of cost control) — but outright repeal will convulse the American political system for years and very likely end in failure.

The candidate who can make the necessary deals is the one who understands the health system best — and also the one candidate who cannot be accused of secretly wishing to destroy the principle of universal coverage. Mitt Romney delivered universal coverage before universal coverage was cool. That's an achievement to be boasted of, not an embarrassment to be apologized for.

There's no such thing as a perfect candidate. It's hard to predict who will and won't make an effective president. It's natural to repine over the candidates who actually exist and yearn for the candidate who is only imagined. Yet in this cycle, it may be the case that the best choice for Republicans and the country is the one that has been waiting there all along.

Of course, IF (big if) Romney were nominated and elected, then we would face the fact that he would have to WANT to make the right changes. The father of Romneycare cannot be trusted to be the terminator of Obamacare. He cannot be trusted to be pro-life. He CAN be trusted to be anti-family as he was when he welcomed the Taxachusetts Supreme Judicial Court inventing state-recorded perversion arrangements as "marriage" in the Bay State. He can be trusted to appoint Larry Lavender and Barbara Babyscraper and Chris Constitutionscrapper to SCOTUS. I have no doubt that Romney's ambition is to be Gordon Gecko in the White House since, other than an obsession with money, he has no discernible principles whatsoever.

Mittens is a fellow who learned much from his dad who ended his political career whining about having been brainwashed on Vietnam. Most folks observing George Romney wondered just what on earth did the brain laundry find to wash. Mitt is just a bit more careful than Dad but not much brighter.

George Herbert Walker Bush who appointed Swish Souter to SCOTUS, and Planned Barrenhood Babs are pushing Christy at the moment but you can count on them to back Mittens when push comes to shove. They are only trying Christy because even they know Mittens has a glass jaw but, at the end, they will hope on behalf of the witless elitists that he might get lucky. If Dorothy Parker were still with us, she would observe as to Mittens' brain pan and backbone that there is no there there.

Daniels told CPAC this year that we should put aside social issues altogether because of the money, money, money obsession. That ended his POTUS chances and he does absolutely nothing to balance a ticket with Mittens. Rubio is another story. Hopefully, if Mittens calls, he will have the dignity to laugh in derision.

BTW, early in his career, Frum wrote a deep root canal book advocating sharp tax increases. He is sooooo obviously Canadian and loves Obamacare. He is just another David Brooks.

Has the conservative movement degenerated to the point that what counts is the ability to make the trains run on time???? Can the name Romney EVER be attached to anything legitimately labeled conservative? No. The GOP is the GOP of Ronald Reagan, substantially enhanced by the social and military conservative "Reagan Democrats." May it never again be the party of Nelson Rockefeller, George Romney, Charles Mathias, Herbert Hoover, UpChuck Percy, or Lowell Weicker. Also, may it soon not be the party of Robert Dole, Gerald Ford, George Herbert Walker Bush (the elder one), Henry Kissinger, Richard Nixon, etc.

Reagan was supposed to be just too, too, well, extreme, to be elected but somehow, he took close 90 states out of 100 in two elections by ignoring the elite in favor of the Reagan Democrats. He took Bush the Elder on board to shut him up and to keep an eye on him. That was his method for choosing Robert Finch as his first Lt. Governor in California. Trust but verify but, when trust is just impossible, at least verify.

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.