Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Huck
Of course nothing you posted carries any legal weight.

Which is of what consequence to this discussion?

The carry no more or less legal weight than the quotes you posted that they counterpoint.

All you have done is imply that one set of statements is to be disregarded while another is to be respected.

"[E]very act of a delegated authority, contrary to the tenor of the commission under which it is exercised, is void. No legislative act, therefore, contrary to the Constitution, can be valid. To deny this, would be to affirm, that the deputy is greater than his principal; that the servant is above his master; that the representatives of the people are superior to the people themselves; that men acting by virtue of powers, may do not only what their powers do not authorize, but what they forbid."

— Alexander Hamiltion

"It is every Americans' right and obligation to read and interpret the Constitution for himself."

— Thomas Jefferson

98 posted on 09/29/2011 7:31:20 PM PDT by tacticalogic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies ]


To: tacticalogic
The quotes I posted describe what is, as opposed to your quotes, which describe what some people think ought to be. We can all talk about what would be nice, but I'm talking about what is. That's the difference.

Anyone with any sense can see that Brutus correctly diagnosed the problem built into the Constitution before it was even ratified. What he described is what has happened. What you posted are musings on what would be nice, but isn't so.

99 posted on 09/29/2011 7:58:36 PM PDT by Huck (Oy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson