No slow one, the judge and the man with the gun have their power because the represent the will of the people. When the dope heads become the majority the judge and the man with the gun will represent them.
>No slow one, the judge and the man with the gun have their power because the represent the will of the people.
Several things:
1) You assume that someone in an official uniform has a legal authority. {Counter example: A sheriff not in his own county.}
2) You assume that that legal authority represents the will of the people. {Counter example: The TSA.}
3) You misconstrue what I asked, either purposefully or ignorantly, which was “what legal authority does the federal government have to regulate drugs, especially considering that a Constitutional amendment was required to take that same regulatory power in the case of the drug alcohol? “
4) You call me slow because I ask you to explain your reasoning, why?
>When the dope heads become the majority the judge and the man with the gun will represent them.
That is the inherent problem of a Democracy, not [necessarily of] a Republic like our Constitution lays out.