Posted on 09/29/2011 6:40:30 AM PDT by Kaslin
This was the WORTHLESS BASTARD the started this “sexual Revolution”: http://www.amazon.com/Kinsey-Crimes-Consequences-Queen-Scheme/dp/0966662415/ref=wl_it_dp_o_npd?ie=UTF8&coliid=IWG4U97UUUC1D&colid=3QEHOQMYACE8C
Amen I say.
This country badly needs divorce reform so that people cannot commit to serial monogamy as a way of life
One husband to one wife needs to become the ideal.
The idea that “it’s all good” needs to stop. Drug use/abuse is not good. Smoking cigarettes is not good. Alcoholism is not good. Sex outside of marriage is not good. Friends with benefits is not good.
I agree with most of the article. This part is just nonsense.
Europe at least considers us old fogies and puritans when it comes to sex. They're farther down the Sexual Revolution road than we are.
The only part of the world that really despises us for this, AFAIK, is the Muslim world, with most of the Muslim men anxious to participate personally but concerned their women might join in.
I think we SHOULD be despised by the world for this, but I don't believe we are.
Upon my word, that is completely revolting and disgusting.
“Europe at least considers us old fogies and puritans when it comes to sex. They’re farther down the Sexual Revolution road than we are.
I’ve been hearing this sentiment for years, but actually, they aren’t, unless by farther down the road you mean they’ve learned it’s better kept exclusive and private after all.
Crime hasn't increased. Nor has disease overall.
And does anyone reading this thread even know anyone with Syphillis? Back in the "Good ol' Days" before the sexual revolution all sorts of famous people had Syphillis.
Good luck with that. Do it, and marriage rates are going to plummet.
Besides being political suicide for whatever party does it.
This may interest you.
fdr on steroids.
Not having been to Europe, I’m limited to what I’ve read and seen in the media.
My understanding is that nudity is widespread in commercial television, newspapers, etc. Is this inaccurate?
According to this tabulation, the US is pretty far down the list for cohabitation rates. This seems to me a pretty good indicator of the extent to which the Sexual Revolution has been accepted by society.
http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/52/27/41920080.pdf
Certainly most European countries have had their birthrates fall off a cliff, which I consider another pretty good indicator. Though much of the higher American birthrate is among depressed minorities.
I’m certainly willing to consider your opinion, but I’d like to hear why you think Europe (by which we usually mean Western Europe) hasn’t had their morality deteriorate even farther than ours.
ping
I’ve been to Europe repeatedly. Compared to them we are a bunch of prudes.
It’s not a revolution, it’s a marketing strategy.
This was not the only ‘sexual revolution’ in human history, and therefore we can study the previous outcomes and forecast the likely oucome of this one. At the core of any sexual revolution is the radical separation of sex from any procreative purpose and from the stable context of marriage.
We have seen this before in the Gonostic sects of ancient and Medieval times, in the Adamites of 14th Century Bohemia and the Libertine and Mattchinne movements in 18th Century France and in the Bolsevik Revolution in Ruussia.
However the first thing that happens to any group or culture that succumbs is a drastic decline in the birth rate. Sexual revolutions are thus intrinsically self-defeating and rapidly fade after about a generation, or are forceably reversed, as in the case of the Soviet Union.
In the early days of that Bolshevik regime, sex was ‘liberated’, divorce by demand, contraception and abortion on demand, homosexuality deciminalized. By 1929 the Soviet Union became the hardest place in the world to get a divorce. In 1932, homosexuality was recriminalized as ‘social menace’. In 1936, abortion was outlawed and access to contraception became more restricted. Why did the Soviet regime do this? Was it because their leaders had starting reading the Bible, or reading Papal Encyclical letters? No, they simply realized that (apart from the ravages of Marxist ‘economics’) Russian society faced total demographic collapse.
Just as obscure theses are now written about the Mattachine movement in France in the 18th Century, so we will see, at the end of the 21st Century books will be wriiten about the rise and fall of the gay movement.
Hello? Heard of AIDS?
Among homosexuals the rate of syphilis is very high, as well as a host of other diseases, parasites and other horrible medical conditions including what used to be called (and may still) “Gay Bowel Syndrome”.
Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda or moral absolutes ping list.
FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search
[ Add keyword homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]
One of the best articles about the "sexual revolution" I've read in a long time. Please don't miss it.
Europe is not one amorphous mass. And there are still cultures that are not as depraved with immorality as the US that hold the free sex culture in abhorrance.
It’s disgusting! Straight people usually don’t get parasites unless they have been to a filthy,third-world country. Then,of course,there’s the issue of incontinence.These homos will litterally be s**tting themselves.Sick,sick,sick.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.