Again. Now is the time to remind people that Obama is only 6.25% African-American. 50% Caucasian, 43.75 % Arab.
Have you seen pictures of Obama’s father? No way that Obama, Sr. was only 1/8th African; he had to be at least 3/4th African.
Oh, and Arabs are Caucasian. So I would guess that Obama is 62.5% Caucasian and 37.5% African.
But even if Herman Cain is 100% of African descent (which would be rare for descendants of blacks held as slaves in the South), and despite the fact that Cain was raised by black parents in a community where plenty of other blacks lived while Obama was raised first by his white mother and Indonesian stepfather in Jakarta (which was less than 1% black) and later by his white grandparents in Honolulu (which was around 1% black), the liberal media will still call Obama the “true black man” and Cain the “Oreo.”
Why?
Is anyone (including “African-Americans”) supposed to think Herman Cain is a better candidate because he is more “African” than Mr. Obama?
What would be more important, and what I think Mr. Cain would agree on, is that it does not matter that Mr. Cain is “African-American” and therefor there is no need for any comparison between his genealogy and Mr. Obama’s.
Mr. Cain wants to be judged as Martin Luther King dreamed Mr. Cain would be judged one day, and that would be NOT by the color of his skin.