Posted on 09/27/2011 6:25:09 PM PDT by moonshinner_09
I thought it was “Tengo un Deram”.
Simple: either we end up with a Quebec problem (two languages and cultures)
or we mainstream these youth, teaching them not just English, but all about the reasons behind the Bill of Rights, the American constitution, the heritage which the Founders inherited (learned) from the British experience.
Yes, it will cost; but it will cost the nation MUCH MORE if we allow a Quebec to develop.
(I know some people will say “send them home”. Nice.
But what if they aren’t going anywhere? )
“the migrant youths themselves were never given the opportunity to voice their concerns” (sniff)
Man, yer breaking my heart, the children ...
Oh I almost forgot—I don’t have a heart.
http://antiwar.com/radio/2011/07/01/v-noah-gimbel/
Yo Tengo un Sueno
“youth under the age of 35”
W.T.F?
Anything other than zero tolerance for illegal immigration is taking a crap on the rule of law and pissing all over what it means to be a USC.
That’s Spanish for “I aint got a creative bone in my body, so I plagarize”
“undocumented youth under the age of 35 ... “
I almost missed this, what the f...?! Yutes?
GMTA
When I was 35 I had a wife, family, job and mortgage.
Are we talking here about the type of French and English `youths’ who like to set cars on fire? Yeah, we definitely need more of those.
At thirty five I was divorced, two kids, had not lived with parents in 18 years and if you ask a liberal, 35 is a child.
In Central and South America, on the rare occasion that these parasites are allowed to vote for their leadership, do they more often support left wing socialists or Jeffersonian Constitutionalists and how do you think that will translate in a positive way here?
My sister goes down there, to Guatemala, on church missions.
If you want to see a really “heartless” immigration policy, check into how Mexico treats its neighbors to the south. There is no welfare system, no `safe houses,’ no Guatemalan gangs or peasants willing to work for nothing, no demonstrations, court appeals, public denunciations of Mexicans angry because their tax dollars are going to feed, house and clothe the “immigrants,” or tear-jerking articles, at least that I’ve seen here.
The federales catch them, give them a beat-down and dump them across the border. I suppose that’s our fault too, though. Author Noah Gimble can bite me.
lol.
lol and lol.
Why can’t a special deal be worked with just San Francisco. If Mexico catches a Guatemalan, they get a choice: go home or go to San Francisco. Soon San Francisco is teeming with tens of thousands of Guatemalans trying to live in that choked socialist parody. Quick karma?
I would agree to the dream act only if part of the qualification process is that the parents must be deported with no possibility of return.
Paint remover or a sandblaster needed to remove the graffiti.
Deport ALL illegals, NO exceptions!
And I DO mean NONE, deport the Cubans too.
Let all of them use their U.S. experience to clean up their own country.
You might have other posts, and even this one, where you make good points. However, this one is just plain stupid, sorry. Cuban refugees are not the same as Illegal immigrants, they just aren't. You can't say "Come here" and then send them home. With the illegals, they were NEVER told to come here and were never given haven. C'mon, THINK man...
“or we mainstream these youth, teaching them not just English, but all about the reasons behind the Bill of Rights, the American constitution, the heritage which the Founders inherited (learned) from the British experience.”
That would be a bit difficult; they are Catholic.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.