Did you see my post #38?-—thinking as you (especially, “This is not an accident, rather these messages are coordinated, in the same way that nearly all Democratic talking points are coordinated.”)
However, you have added some critical points in your excellent post.
Particularly important:
“Thomas Friedman of the NY Times, and to a lesser extent Paul Krugman, have both been pushing the idea that our representative government is getting in the way of the nation’s path to prosperity, interfering with the ability of serious leaders to solve serious problems. Their fawning admiration of dictatorship and one-party rule in China fits right in with Obama’s and Perdue’s goals.”
This event is even more insidious when viewed in the light of the executive order that Perdue signed back in (I believe) 2010, that reportedly prevents civilians from legally transporting firearms away from their own premises if a state of emergency is declared (such as has been done for hurricanes Earl and Irene and possibly in other circumstances).
Perdue has claimed that it does no such thing, however people who have examined the applicable wording state that Perdue’s claims are simply false.
Perdue and her enablers have used and will continue to use ridicule to counter anyone who raises concerns about her actions and her plans. However mudding the water and using ridicule in an attempt to stifle her opposition does not negate the executive order, rather it is a classic technique employed by leftists to avoid being held accountable for their own actions.
You don’t have to believe in conspiracy theories to understand what they have done and what they are trying to do, rather all that you need to do is pay attention to the details.