Gary Kreep is the attorney here. Philip Berg, Hillary’s lawyer, was helping him out at the 9th Circuit Case. Maybe Hillary is behind this move as well. I don’t care, so long as the SOB, and I mean that literally, is removed from the White House by EOY.
One noteworthy event since Kreep and Taitz filed this appeal of the denial of their motions for discovery is Obama’s “release” (well, public disclosure of a pdf if not legal release) of the very same LFBC document that the discovery motion was supposed to get into evidence.
I would expect that all things being equal, SCOTUS might regard Obama’s semi-release of the LFBC to constitute a semi-waiver of his “privacy rights” (so-called rights to fail to demonstrate eligibility to be POTUS).
IIRC the case will hinge on whether the lower court ruling is upheld that Keyes and the other candidate did not have a right to contest the eligibility of Obama because they "couldn't win." Even the appeals court judges squirmed over that at their hearing.
The Constitution is clear on this: only Congress can remove a President. The Judicial branch has no power to do this.