Skip to comments.
Sarah Palin Threatens to Sue ‘Rogue’ Book Publisher
abcnews.com ^
| Sept. 26, 2011
| Jon Karl & Shushannah walshe
Posted on 09/26/2011 3:53:55 PM PDT by Al B.
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-167 next last
To: dfwgator
Taste My Nightstick Dude you forgot the best part...."BOOM...taste my nightstick!"
To: Al B.
Palin would have almost no chance of winning in court.
Just run for president, Sarah.
To: Al B.
23
posted on
09/26/2011 4:09:15 PM PDT
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: Al B.
24
posted on
09/26/2011 4:09:34 PM PDT
by
Donald Rumsfeld Fan
("Science is the belief in the ignorance of experts." Richard Feynman father of Quantum Physics)
To: Al B.
Go for it, they crossed the line, take their money.
25
posted on
09/26/2011 4:10:28 PM PDT
by
org.whodat
(Just another heartless American, hated by Perry and his fellow democrats.)
To: Al B.
Off to get some popcorn, BRB..
26
posted on
09/26/2011 4:10:33 PM PDT
by
BreitbartSentMe
(ATLAS SHRUGGED was supposed to be a warning, NOT a newspaper.)
To: Lazlo in PA
Even Keith Olbermann and NPR refuse to let that dirtbag on their shows. They know that the book is full of lies that McGinnis made up in his sick twisted little head of his. McGinnis’s book I think has sold 10 copies and all of them to members of the press, no one with the IQ of plant life would buy that crap.
To: org.whodat
McGinnis and Random House love redistribution of wealth, I wonder how they will like it when their OWN wealth is taken away LOL.
Sarah doesn’t even need to drag their asses into court, the threat of a lawsuit and the emails that Breitbart has will make Random House pull the plug on that sack of crap of a book
To: Sarah Barracuda
it used to be only money, now, thanks to the late johnny cochran, she can obtain injunctive relief.
29
posted on
09/26/2011 4:12:52 PM PDT
by
longtermmemmory
(VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
To: Al B.
As someone right here on FR once said:
You don't threaten to sue. You sue, and then threaten not to drop the suit.
30
posted on
09/26/2011 4:14:22 PM PDT
by
Steely Tom
(Obama goes on long after the thrill of Obama is gone)
To: trumandogz
All she needs to do is show malice. Her husband never was a big name public official, and neither were her kids.
I'm pretty sure somebody in the family will end up owning a really huge settlement ~
31
posted on
09/26/2011 4:15:16 PM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: Al B.
I hope they put them out of business.
To: TruthHound
Why threaten? If she has a case, drag his ass to court and get all the books recalled!
If you're suing in response to an act for which some redress is possible, the courts look askance if you aren't sincere enough to ask for redress before trying to shake the court system for money. And when you're planning to sue, the well-worded nastigrams you sent along the way can be so quotable in court, and frightening to the bad guys.
To: Al B.
All those anon’ sources will have to be brought in front of the court.
If no sources, then he is in a huge pile of shit. Unless they ID’d the book as fiction. Even then they cant get away with it?
34
posted on
09/26/2011 4:17:28 PM PDT
by
crz
To: trumandogz
It’s practically impossible for a public figure to win a libel case without a signed confession. The e-mails might just make this an exception.
35
posted on
09/26/2011 4:17:56 PM PDT
by
Mountain Troll
(My investment plan - Canned food and shotguns)
To: Al B.
"McGinniss, Random House Published (PRE-PLANNED Literary Hoax
In the email below, sent in January of 2011, McGinniss reveals that his manuscript,
then under legal review at Crown/Random House,
could not prove its most headline-grabbing allegations. "
"From: Joe McGinniss To: Jesse Griffin
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 6:15 PM
Subject: I have to ask you for help
Jesse
Legal review of my manuscript is underway and heres my problem:
no one has ever offered documentation of any of the lurid stories about the Palins.
... Ive neither seen nor heard anything that indicates that Ms. Tripps story has any basis in fact.
... No one has ever provided factual evidence that:
a) Todd had sex with a hooker, or with anyone else outside his marriage.
b) Sarah had an affair with Brad Hanson, or anyone else.
c) Track was a druggie who enlisted in the army to avoid a jail term. Or that he vandalized Wasilla school buses.
d) Willow was involved in the vandalism of the empty house in Meadow Lakes. Or that Sarah rushed back from Hawaii to put the lid on that.
e) Trig is not Sarahs natural born child.
f) Bristol was promiscuous as a high schooler and drank and used drugs, or became pregnant again after Tripps birth.
Jesse, if you can put me in touch with people who are willing
and able to substantiate any of the above, now is the time to do so.
Otherwise, I hope you wont complain that there are no startling new revelations in my book.
... My book represents the last best chance to put the truth about Sarah in front
of the American people in a documented, verifiable way.
But I need facts that I can rely on.
I didnt live this long and work this hard over so many decades
to wind up as AlaskaWTF between hard covers.
Joe"
SSDD
"In 1987, McGinniss agreed to pay $325,000 to settle a lawsuit brought
by the convicted murderer who was the subject of McGinnisss book Fatal Vision."
"In 2003, Random House released a larger-than-life, massive bestseller
by James Frey entitled A Million Little Pieces. Later, it was revealed that the book
was a fantastical literary hoax that made its way past some of the highest-paid
and most respected editors and lawyers in the literary world. Doubleday/Random House
felt compelled to offer full refunds to those who had bought the book."
36
posted on
09/26/2011 4:19:35 PM PDT
by
Diogenesis
("Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. " Pres. Ronald Reagan)
To: Bush_Democrat
From the Palin Lawyer’s letter:
‘Further, as Mr. McGinniss waived the attorney client privilege and disclosed to third parties what “Random House Lawyers” told him (he needed sources and the book was not publishable without them), we will also be entitled to review your company’s legal correspondence with Mr. McGinniss and his responses thereto.’
BOO-YA!!!
37
posted on
09/26/2011 4:19:35 PM PDT
by
BreitbartSentMe
(ATLAS SHRUGGED was supposed to be a warning, NOT a newspaper.)
To: trumandogz
Palin would have almost no chance of winning in court. Sure she would. The book is pure speculation and unfounded rumor, published with malice aforethought, in an attempt to injure the Palins.
Palin's lawyers have the goods on this guy, and the publisher. The publisher has no documentation to back up the tawdry slanders in the book, and McGinniss even wrote an email to a friend admitting that, prior to publication.
I think any court would throw the book at Crown Publishing and Joe McGinniss.
38
posted on
09/26/2011 4:20:44 PM PDT
by
Windflier
(To anger a conservative, tell him a lie. To anger a liberal, tell him the truth.)
To: TruthHound
Because a threat that effectively shuts down further publication, but doesn’t keep the tawdry falsehoods in the headlines, is probably a better political strategy than just unceremoniously bringing down the hammer.
To: stevie_d_64; xkaydet65; dirtboy
40
posted on
09/26/2011 4:21:29 PM PDT
by
AuH2ORepublican
(If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 161-167 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson