Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Miami Vice

The article says the U.S. and Spain have a treaty stating Spanish ships remain Spain’s property. If so, how is this an outrageous situation? Shouldn’t the company have researched the law before spending all that money?


12 posted on 09/26/2011 12:39:13 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: colorado tanker; Miami Vice
The article says the U.S. and Spain have a treaty stating Spanish ships remain Spain’s property. If so, how is this an outrageous situation? Shouldn’t the company have researched the law before spending all that money?

Likewise, U.S. ships remain the property of the United States, no matter where in the World they sank.

In fact, this long standing tradition, codified in maritime law, even extends to the fact that the United States retains sovereign rights to the wreck of the Confederate warship CSS Alabama which was sunk in French waters.

DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY -- NAVAL HISTORY & HERITAGE COMMAND -- UNDERWATER ARCHAEOLOGY BRANCH -- In Defense of Perpetual Title to Sovereign Wrecks

The company knew the law perfectly well. This case was being discussed in Spanish naval history forums a few years ago and the company tried to hide the fact that they were salvaging a Spanish warship (Nuestra Senora de las Mercedes) by claiming that they had salvaged a wreck they code named the “Black Swan” somewhere in the Atlantic.

52 posted on 09/28/2011 1:31:04 PM PDT by Polybius (Defeating Obama is Priority Number One)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson