Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Calif Conservative; Kazan

Your strawman notwithstanding, folks are better informed now. They’re also not willing to just accept the status quo.

Asking tough questions and vetting a potential candidate is not attacking or bashing or whatever the Perry supporters want to call it. This guy needs to answer the questions. By not doing so, he’s indicating he’s got something to hide.

Hell, even the Perry supporters can’t answer simple questions or even engage in honest discussion about the BS “no cost to taxpayers” spew on this in-state tuition legislation.

As soon as some proof comes out showing there is, they just slink away. If he’s your candidate, then it’s your damned responsibility to sell him to me, not the other way around. Prove to me he is what you say he is.

If that’s what qualifies as bashing, then you all might want to check your emotions at the door before trying to cram some guy down our throat we know little to nothing about.

As for your comparisons about FReepers voting liberal instead of for Perry. What a laugh.

If that’s what qualifies as a “winning argument”, in the Perry camp, Perry is toast.


286 posted on 09/27/2011 7:13:29 AM PDT by SZonian (July 27, 2010. Life begins anew.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 262 | View Replies ]


To: SZonian

People didn’t want to accept the status quo in 1980 either, and we got a great president as a result

My point is that more than a few Freepers demand purity in their candidates. If they’re no good on one thing, then everything has to be rotten.

Let’s take Sarah Palin, as an example.
Gov. Palin did the following:

1. raised taxes on an American industry, the oil industry.
2. increased spending as a governor
3. increased spending as a mayor

Raising taxes — Taxed Enough Already, remember us? — is a big no-no in my book.

But I would be more inclined to see Palin through the lens of the overall performance and then determine if I’m going to vote for her, were she to become a nomination or general election candidate. I would compare her to the opponents.

Should I then apply the same rigorous standards as do you? One strike and you’re out? Do we really want another tax-and-spender as president?

Isn’t tax-and-spend the status quo?

Or is that answer found only in Sun Tzu as well ?

-George


288 posted on 09/27/2011 7:35:28 AM PDT by Calif Conservative (rwr and gwb backer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 286 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson