Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: crusty old prospector
I still haven’t seen Chesapeake release any reserve numbers or well economics.

I expect any number from Chesapeake will be preceeded by the words "up to", rather than "at least".

16 posted on 09/26/2011 7:39:40 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: thackney
This website has a decent summary of the Utica Shale. I would say that the oil play would extend to the -8000’ contour at the most. Deeper than that, it is more than likely a gas play. Looks like the oily play will be in eastern Ohio and southern New York. At depths below -12,000’ in Pennsylvania, it is probably over mature.

http://geology.com/articles/utica-shale/

20 posted on 09/26/2011 9:03:44 AM PDT by crusty old prospector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: crusty old prospector
I was close. Rather than “up to”, it was “as much as”.

Chesapeake Energy Corp. produced as much as 1,425 barrels a day of oil and petroleum liquids at one of its first four wells in Ohio’s Utica Shale

http://fuelfix.com/blog/2011/09/28/chesapeake-reports-production-from-first-utica-shale-wells/

29 posted on 09/28/2011 12:56:08 PM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson