The only problem that I have with Herman Cain is that he has no governing experience.
RE: The only problem that I have with Herman Cain is that he has no governing experience.
Two other concerns:
* Foreign Policy experience
* How healthy is he really?
Considering the kind of job those that have had governing experience do, that might not be a bad thing.
Considering the mess the professional politicians have created in every thing except our Military, that is a strong point in his favor.
Dwight D Esinehower had no elected office experience either.
Our system needs deep fundamental reform. Expecting professional politicians to do that is the equivalent of putting drug addicts in charge of a bankrupt pharmacy expecting them to turn it around.
Considering the mess the professional politicians have created in every thing except our Military, that is a strong point in his favor.
Dwight D Eisenhower had no elected office experience either.
Our system needs deep fundamental reform. Expecting professional politicians to do that is the equivalent of putting drug addicts in charge of a bankrupt pharmacy expecting them to turn it around.
“The only problem that I have with Herman Cain is that he has no governing experience.”
Gosh, he’s been a Chief Executive more than once over vast numbers of people, made many good appointments, built successful teams and turned around ailing companies. He was elected and served as President of the National Restaurant Association more than one term, which is one of the largest (if not the largest?) professional association in the country. He’s an expert in numbers, budgets and economics, and - he’s got loads of common sense, solid values, strong religious faith and a deep love of our country.
He’s a problem solver who knows how to choose and enjoin exceptional people. He’s got what it takes to be OUR Chief Executive (imho :-)