I am supporting our Constitution and our laws and not misunderstood or made-up rituals that misrepresent our country’s Constitution.
If you do not understand our federal government’s dictate for how to handle our states’ protection, immigration procedures, and deportation, then you might be enlightened to read some of my other posts in this thread. When you understand federal laws and procedures and see how they relate to our Constitution, you can begin to see how our country is SUPPOSED to operate.
My question would be, if I am not conservative because I want our federal government to protect our borders as per the Constitution, or if I am not conservative because I think our federal government should honor its responsibility to deport but also its responsibility to do so as per its Constitutional and legal mandates, then what does that make YOU who seems to me to be indicating we can make up our own Deputy-Dog rules irregardless of our Founding Father’s vision and time-honored rule of law based on our Constitution?
We have a border or we do not. If we do not enforce our border laws to the fullest extent then we are not a nation at all. How is it that we accept laws to assist people who are not even LEGALLY here? Do you find this acceptable?
Yes or no?