Amazingly, Bill O'Reilly thought 'once elected I decided to give the president a chance to see if his economic vision, big government management of the economy, could turn things around', and it's a wonder O'Reilly brags about having the best research and yet they couldn't figure out the end results...
Way back, when McCain had no opponent and wouldn't/couldn't articulate the economic negative Democrats would be, I figured even if Hilliary got in the market would decline, but to be positive I figured my 401k investment dollar cost average would be lower, but now I'm left wondering; If the companies in my 401k that may increase in value will exceed those that go out of business?
1 posted on
09/24/2011 12:43:19 PM PDT by
Son House
To: All
2 posted on
09/24/2011 12:44:14 PM PDT by
Son House
(The Economic Boom Heard Around The World => TEA Party 2012)
To: Son House
3 posted on
09/24/2011 12:47:05 PM PDT by
central_va
( I won't be reconstructed and I do not give a damn.)
To: Son House
Solyndra? I’d hope that’s not in one of my 401k investment choices, or anyone else’s. We’ve all paid dearly for Solyndra, even if you think not, if you were looking for a job, your job opportunities were diminished by government spending.
5 posted on
09/24/2011 12:56:06 PM PDT by
Son House
(The Economic Boom Heard Around The World => TEA Party 2012)
To: Son House
Bill O'Reilly: What Presidents Obama and Carter Do Not Understand
For starters.
6 posted on
09/24/2011 12:58:48 PM PDT by
TruthShallSetYouFree
("Nanny Care State" is not a Division 3 football powerhouse.)
To: Son House
“Amazingly, Bill O’Reilly thought ‘once elected I decided to give the president a chance to see if his economic vision, big government management of the economy, could turn things around’...”
Hey Bill, I’m just a simple guy and have one question: When has central planning ever worked?
7 posted on
09/24/2011 1:02:28 PM PDT by
Starboard
To: Son House
O’Reilly quoting Dick Morris. Put on your thinking caps, you know this will be deep! /sarc
To: Son House
When President Obama took office, I knew he was an income redistribution guy.' Wow, Baxter is some kind of smart to have figured that out. I mean, he must have been the only one in the entire county to have picked-up on that. Thanks, Ted, keep lookin' out for the folks. /s
10 posted on
09/24/2011 1:08:26 PM PDT by
JPG
(Palin '12)
To: Son House
Obama needs to give BOR another interview so he can worm himself into Bill’s good graces. Then, BoR can keep looking out “for the folks”.
11 posted on
09/24/2011 1:09:38 PM PDT by
Baladas
((ABBHO))
To: Son House
with apologies to Ted Knight
Find O'Reilly


.
12 posted on
09/24/2011 1:11:47 PM PDT by
Elle Bee
To: Son House
Way back, when McCain had no opponent and wouldn't/couldn't articulate the economic negative Democrats would be, I figured even if Hilliary got in the market would decline, but to be positive I figured my 401k investment dollar cost average would be lower, but now I'm left wondering; If the companies in my 401k that may increase in value will exceed those that go out of business? I made that mistake in 2000. Never let politics influence your stock market decisions!
1. Wall Street types are mostly lefties and statist Republicans.
2. There are no more free market Republicans. Except the Pauls, maybe. Bailouts and inflation will keep stocks afloat. Don't count on a free market savior.
To: Son House
This is not a partisan analysis. When President Obama took office, I knew he was an income redistribution guy. In fact, I challenged him on that in our first interview during the 2008 campaign. But once elected I decided to give the president a chance to see if his economic vision, big government management of the economy, could turn things around. Well, we all know things have gotten worse, not better. Bill O'Reilly 'Talking Point' memo
This kind of idiocy is why Bill O'Reilly's numbingly predictable populist positions turn me off, although many Americans seem to like this stuff because O'Reilly has great ratings. O'Reilly is hiding the fact that (a) he didn't want to disparage the First Black President and, (b) he hasn't a freaking clue as to how the U.S. economy works. Yet, O'Reilly will shout down more knowledgable guests and proclaim that he is 'not an ideologue' inferring that this claim renders his opinion totally devoid of any bias. It also renders them totally devoid of any sense.
14 posted on
09/24/2011 1:59:44 PM PDT by
Jim Scott
( "Game On!" - Sarah Palin)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson