Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DTogo

Perry understands that using all methods in targeted ways is the only reasonable solution

I am sick and tired of the “only a fence will work crowd”
The cost would be ridiculous, it would be tied up with law suit and legal fees out the wazoo because virtually the entire border is privately owned land and there are are water rights issues along with international treaties to deal with.

On top of all that, it is unworkable without patrols.
Many stretches of the Texas border are 2..3 hundred miles from anything.
Even if we had the fence and we had the manpower we dont have the infrastructure to house the troopers
We will have to run electricity, water and roads to the middle of nowhere just so we can build barracks for the troopers.

Perry realizes that Arial surveillance is the answer for these remote areas.

America is becoming a “Sound Bite Nation”
Sometimes I think that is the biggest threat to America.


91 posted on 09/24/2011 10:46:32 AM PDT by mylife (OPINIONS ~ $ 1.00 HALFBAKED ~ 50c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies ]


To: All
A Mexican family enjoys a day at the beach on the US side of the fence at Border Field State Park in Ca.


93 posted on 09/24/2011 11:13:00 AM PDT by mylife (OPINIONS ~ $ 1.00 HALFBAKED ~ 50c)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

To: mylife
I am sick and tired of the “only a fence will work crowd”

Most Conservatives likely want Fence+ and not "only a fence."

The cost would be ridiculous, it would be tied up with law suit and legal fees out the wazoo because virtually the entire border is privately owned land and there are are water rights issues along with international treaties to deal with.

America is not (was not) a country of excuses, but is (should be) a "Git 'er done" country. If we can build the "intercontinental" railroad in the 1800s, highways, transmission lines, and gas pipelines all across the country, and send men to the moon, why is an above-ground fence such a monumental and insurmountable task??

On top of all that, it is unworkable without patrols. Many stretches of the Texas border are 2..3 hundred miles from anything.

That's 200~300 miles to be exploited by those with nefarious objectives. Why not make it more difficult for them with a fence backed up by surveillance?

Even if we had the fence and we had the manpower we dont have the infrastructure to house the troopers We will have to run electricity, water and roads to the middle of nowhere just so we can build barracks for the troopers.

More lame excuses. We have military bases and remote outposts all over the US and world. Again, is America a "Can do" country or not? Are we going to have homeland security or CYA "blue ribbon" commissions after the next 9/11 with ~20M unknown people wandering our country?

Perry realizes that Arial surveillance is the answer for these remote areas.

Part of the answer, not the only answer, much like "fence only" is not the answer. Let's "Git 'er done" and stop making excuses.

98 posted on 09/24/2011 12:00:11 PM PDT by DTogo (High time to bring back the Sons of Liberty !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson