“OTOH, there is nothing healthy or normal about homosexuality, ever.”
I never said there was.
And I have been looking at this longer than since “since the late 80s.” And I am well aware that “its very nature violates Nature’s laws.” But worse is that it violates the laws of Him who created nature, and saw His perfect creation fall and crumble into sin and corruption.
I stand by everything I said. And I don’t think you either comprehended or gave serious thought to what I said. So, to accuse me of “parroting the gay agenda talking points” I find offensive and unthinking. Read what I wrote, then get back to me.
DADT is the proper policy. We are now going to substitute one extreme of policy for the other (i.e. the old, old one), and probably far more demoralizing and destructive, one.
You are saying that the "no homosexuals in the military and yes we can ask" is "extreme" and implying or rather saying that such policy was demoralizing and destructive. So I would say that yes, you are promoting the homosexual agenda, albeit in a stealth manner. Also, on another thread just now you agreed with some guy who said that homosexuals in the military caused no problems.
Oops, on this thread, right above.