Here is the problem with your expliantion it seems everything that been Good for Texas is because of Perry’s strong leadership and everything that is bad Perry couldn’t do anything about, because we don’t understand that the Govenor in Texas is a weak position because of its constitution. So which is it?
He couldn’t do anything about it. It was a bill passed by both the senate and the house.
BTW I’m not sure where you come up with what you posted to me because I never said anything about his leadership one way or the other.