... what better way to collect all the entitlements out there.
Perhaps they view having a baby out of wedlock and collecting welfare as comparable to being “employed” by the U.S. Govt.
“They’re” providing a “product” for which the Govt is reimbursing them ... therefore, they are being productive
undocumented citizens.
Why do we never call out the Democrat party for the failures of the war on poverty?
Welfare as we know it became an entitlement program in the ‘60s as part of LBJ’s war on poverty.
There was a time in this country when a girl who got pregnant without a husband couldn’t just go and get on public assistance.
That all changed because we didn’t want to be judgemental as to why a girl had a baby without a husband.
But when things reach a critical mass as they have today, in which a majority of babies among some groups of people are born into public assistance, out of wedlock, and expect to live their entire lives there, is this really a good solution to the problem of out of wedlock pregnancy?
And has the very fact of public assistance programs encouraged illegitimacy???
Are we allowed to ask some politically incorrect questions about these matters???