Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Girl's end-of-life case could haunt Romney (Haleigh Poutre)
Politico ^ | 9/22/11 | Glenn Thrush

Posted on 09/23/2011 5:20:37 AM PDT by wagglebee

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
Romney was fully prepared to stand by and do nothing while an innocent victim of a crime was murdered by the state.
1 posted on 09/23/2011 5:20:41 AM PDT by wagglebee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: cgk; Coleus; cpforlife.org; narses; Salvation; 8mmMauser
Pro-Life Ping
2 posted on 09/23/2011 5:22:07 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb; floriduh voter; Lesforlife; Sun
Ping
3 posted on 09/23/2011 5:22:41 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 185JHP; 230FMJ; AKA Elena; Albion Wilde; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; Amos the Prophet; ...
Moral Absolutes Ping!

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the moral absolutes ping list.

FreeRepublic moral absolutes keyword search
[ Add keyword moral absolutes to flag FR articles to this ping list ]


4 posted on 09/23/2011 5:23:33 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
aides to then-Massachusetts Gov. Romney pressed vigorously in court for a pull-the-plug order

I don't understand why government staffers would do this.

More generally, the problem with Romney is not so much what he says, but that you can't believe him. It's possible that he could explain a dramatic conversion event, as some of the former abortion-business workers have done, that would convincingly display a personal commitment to protecting human life.

However, to the best of my knowledge, he has not done this.

5 posted on 09/23/2011 5:24:39 AM PDT by Tax-chick ( "It is my job to be rational, and I have no doubt at all that I have that power--sometimes.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick
It's possible that he could explain a dramatic conversion event, as some of the former abortion-business workers have done, that would convincingly display a personal commitment to protecting human life.

Myth's "conversion" to pro-life directly coincided with his decision to run for president four years ago. It was a claim he made for expediency and nothing else.

As you mentioned, there have been plenty of abortionists who have converted to pro-life; however, they have always spoken of some catharsis that occurred.

6 posted on 09/23/2011 5:34:35 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

Imho, he is obsessed with becoming president. If he is going to run as a Republican, it’s a benefit to him to proclaim himself to be pro-life.


7 posted on 09/23/2011 5:38:29 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Say it loud and clear. Romney is no friend of people who actually care about lives of the innocent.


8 posted on 09/23/2011 5:44:19 AM PDT by freeangel ( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; trisham
... it’s a benefit to him to proclaim himself to be pro-life ... and pro-defense, pro-business, pro-Second Amendment, etc.

Will voters buy it? Personally, I doubt it. I think that as soon as voting starts, Mitt and his pretty hair will be toast.

9 posted on 09/23/2011 5:46:13 AM PDT by Tax-chick ( "It is my job to be rational, and I have no doubt at all that I have that power--sometimes.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

Willard the RINO is Wrong on Sanctity of Life, Wrong on the 2nd Ammendment, and Wrong on Health Care.....that’s 3 Strikes Willard! Back to the dugout!


10 posted on 09/23/2011 5:48:43 AM PDT by 230FMJ (...from my cold, dead, fingers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

None of the changes Romney implemented would prevent disabled people being euthanized as they intended to do to Haleigh Poutre. He made procedural changes that allow social workers to have more complete records and more control over a situation, but he didn’t offer any protections to the lives of vulnerable people. It was all feel-good measures that allowed Romney to speechify about his version of hope and change, without actually improving the lives of the victims.


11 posted on 09/23/2011 5:49:09 AM PDT by BykrBayb (Somewhere, my flower is there. ~ Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xzins
Ping
12 posted on 09/23/2011 5:50:33 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
Dear God...

*snip*

"On Jan. 16, 2008, the state's highest court sided with Romney's DSS and gave permission for the removal of a respirator and feeding tube.

But a day after the decision, Haleigh regained consciousness and began responding to simple commands, to the astonishment of doctors at Baystate hospital in Springfield."

*snip*

"My concern is with this young girl and her current status," he told the Boston Globe. "In light of reported improvements in her medical condition, it should be clear to everyone that no action should be taken to end this girl's life."

********************************************

Well DUH!

This is breathtaking!

13 posted on 09/23/2011 5:51:01 AM PDT by Irenic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

Only liberals are that easily fooled, and not many liberals will vote for a politician with an “R” behind his name.


14 posted on 09/23/2011 5:52:13 AM PDT by BykrBayb (Somewhere, my flower is there. ~ Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

Imho, he can’t possibly win in the south. Anyone who is supporting him is blind to that fact. I can’t see anyone who is or was in the military voting for him, either.


15 posted on 09/23/2011 5:52:40 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Irenic; Tax-chick; trisham; BykrBayb
Yep, Mitt was fully behind killing Haleigh because she was unconscious, the only reason he decided she should live is because she regained consciousness.
16 posted on 09/23/2011 5:54:46 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Irenic
His position was that she was dead, but then her condition improved, so everyone should agree not to kill her. Oh yeah, that's presidential material. LOL
17 posted on 09/23/2011 5:58:52 AM PDT by BykrBayb (Somewhere, my flower is there. ~ Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee
I recently read about a study which revealed some people tend to believe dead people are more aware than cognitively disabled people. " My grandpa in heaven wants me to stay healthy, but a vegetative patient doesn’t want anything. PVS traps the mind, but death liberates it." We routinely see variations on that argument, as justification for killing people like Haleigh Poutre, Terri Schiavo, and our own parents.
18 posted on 09/23/2011 6:11:28 AM PDT by BykrBayb (Somewhere, my flower is there. ~ Þ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: BykrBayb

That’s interesting. I wonder who offered that as a rationalization? It sounds like something Peter Singer might say.


19 posted on 09/23/2011 6:43:16 AM PDT by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: wagglebee

“In Sept. 2008, officials with Romney’s Department of Social Services - admitting they ignored numerous signs the girl was being battered over a period of months — obtained custody of Haleigh, determined that the had “no possibility of regaining a meaningful existence” due to the extent of her brain damage, and began to consider judicial end-of-life options including removal of life support and feeding.”

This is the first I have heard of this.

No concern for her meaningful existence when she was being battered. So the DSS only wanted to take custody when it was necessary for them to kill her. Guess they didn’t want the competition.


20 posted on 09/23/2011 7:21:04 AM PDT by Apogee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson