Skip to comments.
Girl's end-of-life case could haunt Romney (Haleigh Poutre)
Politico ^
| 9/22/11
| Glenn Thrush
Posted on 09/23/2011 5:20:37 AM PDT by wagglebee
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Romney was fully prepared to stand by and do nothing while an innocent victim of a crime was murdered by the state.
1
posted on
09/23/2011 5:20:41 AM PDT
by
wagglebee
To: cgk; Coleus; cpforlife.org; narses; Salvation; 8mmMauser
Pro-Life Ping
2
posted on
09/23/2011 5:22:07 AM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: BykrBayb; floriduh voter; Lesforlife; Sun
Ping
3
posted on
09/23/2011 5:22:41 AM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: 185JHP; 230FMJ; AKA Elena; Albion Wilde; Aleighanne; Alexander Rubin; Amos the Prophet; ...
4
posted on
09/23/2011 5:23:33 AM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: wagglebee
aides to then-Massachusetts Gov. Romney pressed vigorously in court for a pull-the-plug order I don't understand why government staffers would do this.
More generally, the problem with Romney is not so much what he says, but that you can't believe him. It's possible that he could explain a dramatic conversion event, as some of the former abortion-business workers have done, that would convincingly display a personal commitment to protecting human life.
However, to the best of my knowledge, he has not done this.
5
posted on
09/23/2011 5:24:39 AM PDT
by
Tax-chick
( "It is my job to be rational, and I have no doubt at all that I have that power--sometimes.")
To: Tax-chick
It's possible that he could explain a dramatic conversion event, as some of the former abortion-business workers have done, that would convincingly display a personal commitment to protecting human life. Myth's "conversion" to pro-life directly coincided with his decision to run for president four years ago. It was a claim he made for expediency and nothing else.
As you mentioned, there have been plenty of abortionists who have converted to pro-life; however, they have always spoken of some catharsis that occurred.
6
posted on
09/23/2011 5:34:35 AM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: Tax-chick
Imho, he is obsessed with becoming president. If he is going to run as a Republican, it’s a benefit to him to proclaim himself to be pro-life.
7
posted on
09/23/2011 5:38:29 AM PDT
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: wagglebee
Say it loud and clear. Romney is no friend of people who actually care about lives of the innocent.
8
posted on
09/23/2011 5:44:19 AM PDT
by
freeangel
( (free speech is only good until someone else doesn't like it)
To: wagglebee; trisham
... its a benefit to him to proclaim himself to be pro-life ... and pro-defense, pro-business, pro-Second Amendment, etc.
Will voters buy it? Personally, I doubt it. I think that as soon as voting starts, Mitt and his pretty hair will be toast.
9
posted on
09/23/2011 5:46:13 AM PDT
by
Tax-chick
( "It is my job to be rational, and I have no doubt at all that I have that power--sometimes.")
To: wagglebee
Willard the RINO is Wrong on Sanctity of Life, Wrong on the 2nd Ammendment, and Wrong on Health Care.....that’s 3 Strikes Willard! Back to the dugout!
10
posted on
09/23/2011 5:48:43 AM PDT
by
230FMJ
(...from my cold, dead, fingers.)
To: wagglebee
None of the changes Romney implemented would prevent disabled people being euthanized as they intended to do to Haleigh Poutre. He made procedural changes that allow social workers to have more complete records and more control over a situation, but he didn’t offer any protections to the lives of vulnerable people. It was all feel-good measures that allowed Romney to speechify about his version of hope and change, without actually improving the lives of the victims.
11
posted on
09/23/2011 5:49:09 AM PDT
by
BykrBayb
(Somewhere, my flower is there. ~ Þ)
To: xzins
Ping
12
posted on
09/23/2011 5:50:33 AM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: wagglebee
Dear God...
*snip*
"On Jan. 16, 2008, the state's highest court sided with Romney's DSS and gave permission for the removal of a respirator and feeding tube.
But a day after the decision, Haleigh regained consciousness and began responding to simple commands, to the astonishment of doctors at Baystate hospital in Springfield."
*snip*
"My concern is with this young girl and her current status," he told the Boston Globe. "In light of reported improvements in her medical condition, it should be clear to everyone that no action should be taken to end this girl's life."
********************************************
Well DUH!
This is breathtaking!
13
posted on
09/23/2011 5:51:01 AM PDT
by
Irenic
To: Tax-chick
Only liberals are that easily fooled, and not many liberals will vote for a politician with an “R” behind his name.
14
posted on
09/23/2011 5:52:13 AM PDT
by
BykrBayb
(Somewhere, my flower is there. ~ Þ)
To: Tax-chick
Imho, he can’t possibly win in the south. Anyone who is supporting him is blind to that fact. I can’t see anyone who is or was in the military voting for him, either.
15
posted on
09/23/2011 5:52:40 AM PDT
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: Irenic; Tax-chick; trisham; BykrBayb
Yep, Mitt was fully behind killing Haleigh because she was unconscious, the only reason he decided she should live is because she regained consciousness.
16
posted on
09/23/2011 5:54:46 AM PDT
by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: Irenic
His position was that she was dead, but then her condition improved, so everyone should agree not to kill her. Oh yeah, that's presidential material. LOL
17
posted on
09/23/2011 5:58:52 AM PDT
by
BykrBayb
(Somewhere, my flower is there. ~ Þ)
To: wagglebee
I recently read about a study which revealed some people tend to believe dead people are more aware than cognitively disabled people. " My grandpa in heaven wants me to stay healthy, but a vegetative patient doesnt want anything. PVS traps the mind, but death liberates it." We routinely see variations on that argument, as justification for killing people like Haleigh Poutre, Terri Schiavo, and our own parents.
18
posted on
09/23/2011 6:11:28 AM PDT
by
BykrBayb
(Somewhere, my flower is there. ~ Þ)
To: BykrBayb
That’s interesting. I wonder who offered that as a rationalization? It sounds like something Peter Singer might say.
19
posted on
09/23/2011 6:43:16 AM PDT
by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: wagglebee
“In Sept. 2008, officials with Romney’s Department of Social Services - admitting they ignored numerous signs the girl was being battered over a period of months obtained custody of Haleigh, determined that the had “no possibility of regaining a meaningful existence” due to the extent of her brain damage, and began to consider judicial end-of-life options including removal of life support and feeding.”
This is the first I have heard of this.
No concern for her meaningful existence when she was being battered. So the DSS only wanted to take custody when it was necessary for them to kill her. Guess they didn’t want the competition.
20
posted on
09/23/2011 7:21:04 AM PDT
by
Apogee
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-26 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson