To: SideoutFred
I'm just concerned that Romney couldn't even beat McAmnesty and Huckabee last time around. Who knows what dirty tricks Axelrod & Co. are planning if he's the nominee...It's a lose-lose for the GOP at this moment.
And Issa just jumped the gun by endorsing Mitt. That is a political distraction from his principal duty, which is to investigate the Demorat-nest in D.C.
14 posted on
09/23/2011 12:12:18 AM PDT by
rfp1234
(Anybody but Baracchio in 2012)
To: rfp1234
McCain was just like Dole...”next in line”. The GOP does this every so often and then realizes typically by the next election that they better nominate someone who can actually win.
15 posted on
09/23/2011 12:23:21 AM PDT by
SideoutFred
(B.O. Stinks...it really does)
To: rfp1234
From what I saw tonight, it seems to me that Perry is going to fade fast and that, surprizingly, Santorum will be the one who will best be able to take on Mitt and beat him.
Gingrich will help, but he’ll have to settle for being Santorum’s VP in this scenario. His experience would be great, but no one wants Calista as First Lady. :)
36 posted on
09/23/2011 2:37:05 AM PDT by
fightinJAG
(Please stop posting "helpful hints" in parentheses the title box. Thank you.)
To: rfp1234
I'm just concerned that Romney couldn't even beat McAmnesty and Huckabee last time around. Who knows what dirty tricks Axelrod & Co. are planning if he's the nominee...It's a lose-lose for the GOP at this moment.
Precisely. I've been asking for a while why we'd nominate the guy who lost to the guy who lost to zer0bama?
Do we really want a confirmed loser as our canidate?
44 posted on
09/23/2011 6:20:23 AM PDT by
Peet
(Cogito ergo dubito.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson