He made a statement the muzzies took “offense” to and they demanded an apology.
He apologized. That ended it for me.
You defend it by saying he did it because “he realized how determinated [determined?] the Establishment is to punish anyone who dares raise the question of the role that Islam plays in the War on Terror.”
That would be a double weakness.
Here's a man who blasts the muzzies with the truth (and he knows Islam thoroughly) to their face - and refuses their demands to apologize. Here's one super little example followed by an in depth statement on knowing the enemy. They leave him alone now because they know, one, that he won't back down, and two, not only will he not back down, he knows Islam through and through and will explain it again to the sheeple.
And he DOES NOT speak in PC.
“Don't blow sunshine up my butt...”
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kkWXEvOenNY
He knows our enemy - the only one who seems too...
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xhOzIQ1-CmQ&feature=related
Lt. Col. (congressman) Allen West. WE need this man in the WH - THIS ticket, either way.(I'd like to see Sarah win and choose West for VP).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=C7RKIpufStQ
Sarah endorsed Col West in 2010
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M1U7v5wWCEU
He was wrong to say I will not appoint any Muslims. That was like saying I will not appoint Catholics or Jews or Mormons. That is contrary to the express language of the Constitution, which permits no religious test for office. However, he might have called out all Muslims, such as CAIR, who are blatantly anti-semitic and hostile to the existence of Israel, a major American ally. Personally I would vote to limit all immigration from the Middle East for an extended period, except for religious and political refugees. But that will not fly, because most Americans think that Muslims are sort of like Jews.