Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pelosi: GOP using disaster aid as excuse to kill clean-vehicles program
The Hill ^

Posted on 09/22/2011 2:01:39 PM PDT by Sub-Driver

Pelosi: GOP using disaster aid as excuse to kill clean-vehicles program By Mike Lillis - 09/22/11 04:04 PM ET

House Republicans are using the disaster-relief debate as a guise for killing off an environmental program they oppose, House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi charged Thursday.

The California Democrat said the GOP's proposal to cut $1.5 billion from the Advanced Technology Vehicle Manufacturing Program (ATVM) is as much an effort to end that initiative as it is a deficit-reduction strategy.

"There's a billion and a half dollars left in the [ATVM] till," Pelosi told reporters in the Capitol. "They take a billion of it to pay for the disaster, and they take a … half a billion of it and rescind it. So it was clear to us that this wasn't about paying for the disaster. This was about destroying an initiative that is job creating.

"Why would you take a half a billion dollars out of an initiative with the excuse that you need it for a disaster and just rescind it, just erase it?" she added. "We shouldn't even be having this conversation."

The House on Wednesday shot down the Republicans' continuing resolution to fund the government through Nov. 18. The proposal included almost $3.7 billion in emergency relief for states and victims of recent natural disasters, including hurricanes on the east coast, flooding in the Midwest and wildfires in Texas. One-billion dollars from the ATVM cut would go to cover the most immediate disaster-relief costs.

Citing the ATVM cut, all but six Democrats opposed the measure. Forty-eight Republicans also voted no, objecting to the level of 2012 discretionary spending, which they say is too high.

Wednesday's surprise vote has sent GOP leaders scrambling back to the drawing board in search of a compromise that could thread the needle between Democratic and Republican critics.

Pelosi on Thursday that any offset to the disaster-relief provision – not only the ATVM provision – would be opposed by Democrats.

"There has never been an offset for disaster assistance," Pelosi said.

"There are many emergencies [that have been offset]," she noted. "A natural disaster is something else."

Democratic leaders had tried unsuccessfully Wednesday to replace the GOP's $3.7 billion provision with a $6.9 billion Senate-passed proposal that doesn't include cuts elsewhere in the budget.

Pelosi said she's hopeful GOP leaders will offer a compromise that would keep the House levels of funding but drop the offset provision.

"It would be my hope that they would split the difference," she said.

"It has to be resolved by next week," she added. "The burden is on the majority."


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: atvm
clean-vehicles program? No more car washes?
1 posted on 09/22/2011 2:01:44 PM PDT by Sub-Driver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Blah, blah, blah


2 posted on 09/22/2011 2:05:32 PM PDT by chris37 (representative)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Was your private luxury jet a hybrid?


3 posted on 09/22/2011 2:07:02 PM PDT by Huskrrrr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

So there’s already $1.5 billion appropriated and sitting in a “till” for some green vehicle boondoggle and the Republicans have suggesting spending it first on disaster aid, if the Dems are crying about the immediate need for more disaster aid? Wow - sounds like some Repubs grew a pair. Makes complete sense and provides less opportunity for wasteful spending. No wonder Pelosi is so angry.


4 posted on 09/22/2011 2:10:05 PM PDT by rockvillem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Huskrrrr

Whe the Botox queen flies in an electric plane, I will listen. NOt before.


5 posted on 09/22/2011 2:10:05 PM PDT by ridesthemiles
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: chris37

Hey Nancy, works for me.


6 posted on 09/22/2011 2:11:43 PM PDT by Mouton (Voting is an opiate of the electorate. Nothing changes no matter who wins..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

put another way...Democrats are attempting to foist another “do nothing but spend lots of taxpayer dollars” program on the backs of disaster victims.

Take your broom and shove it, you witch!


7 posted on 09/22/2011 2:11:44 PM PDT by SueRae (I can see November 2012 from my HOUSE!!!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

One day that woman will be irrelevent.


8 posted on 09/22/2011 2:15:40 PM PDT by VRW Conspirator (The unemployment problem only can be solved when Obama is unemployed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SueRae

Dontcha know, people are in the streets demanding electric carts from the gubmint.


9 posted on 09/22/2011 2:18:05 PM PDT by dogcaller
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: VRW Conspirator

Clean vehicles, alternative energy, global warming.

All crocks designed to move moeny from Americans to Socialists.

The Democrat party is nothing more than Chicago thugs using Communism to further their criminal agenda.


10 posted on 09/22/2011 2:18:25 PM PDT by EQAndyBuzz (Sarahcuda in 2012. Nothing but Net!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Who feels the need to post this bile ?


11 posted on 09/22/2011 2:25:33 PM PDT by UB355 (Slower traffic keep right)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rockvillem

it would help if they took out a few ads on TV adn RADIO to tell the story - diaster relief or money for electirc cars - which do you think is the best use of 1.5 billion...call your congressman.


12 posted on 09/22/2011 2:28:21 PM PDT by q_an_a (uues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

“There has never been an offset for disaster assistance,” Pelosi said.


THAT’S EXACTLY THE PROBLEM!!!

If I have a budget, and a financial emergency occurs, I have to adjust my budget.

Congress has not done that — they just add to the budget (if they have one) and steal the money from our children and grandchildren.

But just because that is how it has been done in the past is not an arguement for continuing to do so.


13 posted on 09/22/2011 3:50:58 PM PDT by Mack the knife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

Nanzi does not need to defund clean-vehicle program, she can defund cancer research.


14 posted on 09/22/2011 4:20:55 PM PDT by depressed in 06 (I'll follow an eloquent Allen West out of hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson