I like Palin way more than Romney.
I don’t like Palin stringing the conservative base along as she sells book and gets speaking fees.
Ummm. What’s worse? Not being a candidate and getting speaking fees? Or BEING a candidate who is getting paid by the state that JUST elected him for NOT doing his job and has to pay for his security wherever he goes while campaigning?
“I like Palin way more than Romney.
I don’t like Palin stringing the conservative base along as she sells book and gets speaking fees.”
Why would selling books and getting speaking fees bother you? It is not illegal, immoral or even fattening. :)
Reagan didn’t declare until November, and look at how well that tunred out.
Are you a socialist? Do you think she should have short-circuited her earning potential just so the "conservative collective" could pick up the entire tab for her presidential run? Or is it better if she can be frugal and pay her own way to some extent with good old private capital acquired for the free market value of her labor? Especially when that financial independence is a key part of her campaign theme, you know, no crony capitalism, no obligations to big money, a candidate genuinely free to do the right thing. You really have a problem with that? Inquiring minds want to know...
What does that mean?