Bryan Preston, who is an undisclosed Perry acolyte, at Pajamis Media, has issued his defense of Perry. His defense is to slam the Texans for Justice in Politics rather than take on the specific allegations, allegations which have been collaborated by second and third sources.
In fairness, TPJ does have some unsavory ties.
Could a journalist simply do more than jump into a reflexive defense mode for Perry and do the tough work of challenging the merits of the allegations?
Everyone deserves to know "Texans for Public Justice" takes money from George Soros, as well as the other connections they have.
Shouldn't a journalist simple do more than jump into reflexive "gotcha" mode and do the tough work of investigating the merits of "allegations" by a partisan watchdog?
We need more specifics, not just generalized innuendo. Saying a governor is a good fundraiser for his governor's association isn't much.