[Servant of the Cross]

... the only ones that consistently espouse rigorous adherence to the Constitution?

A little Ron Paul ...

In the space of 24 hours, Rep. Ron Paul (R., Texas) has voted for tax hikes, against censure for Charlie Rangel, and defended Julian Assange.

Ron Paul votes to homosexualize the US Military

Ron Paul hearts Debra Medina

Ron Paul: Ground Zero Mosque Opponents are “Islamophobes.”

Ron Paul wouldn't have approved Osama bin Laden operation

Paul will give his seal of approval to four candidates: Green Party nominee Cynthia McKinney, Libertarian Party nominee Bob Barr, independent candidate Ralph Nader and Constitution Party candidate Chuck Baldwin.

Ron Paul booed during Tea Party debate after Osama bin Laden answer

[EasySt]

You can beat me up all you like, but I never said Ron Paul wasn’t a kook.

What I’m saying is that we hear precious little from any of the other candidates about reigning in an out of control Fed, Taking back control of our money from the world banksters, drastically cutting the size and scope of the Federal Government by eliminating entire agencies, or simply taking the Constitution seriously when it comes to States rights and the power that is reserved to the people.

Only the kooks actually go there. None of the other candidates give any of that more than token lip service, and little, if any, actual observable action.

Why is that?

Why?

How did seriously following the Constitution become the new third rail in this country?

How did we let Ron Paul become the primary owner of that political position?