Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MindBender26
Entry and search are one thing. Rape is another. Please, do not post such stupidity. It makes us all look bad, not just you.

Denial of Constitutional rights are all the same - deny one, you've denied them all. A five year old can grasp this, yet you seek to modify the absolute horror of this ruling with sophmoric pseudointellectual insults?

Thanks SO much for sharing - and when the cops illegally kick in your door, don't worry, they wouldn't THINK of exceeding those entry limits.

86 posted on 09/20/2011 8:41:46 PM PDT by Talisker (History will show the Illuminati won the ultimate Darwin Award.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]


To: Talisker
Since you did not understand either the ruling or my post, but rather descend into personal insults, I am probably wasting my time, but I'll try.

#1, the ruling in no way allowed a LEO to rape your wife.

#2, Stop and think. If you think a search is illegal, is it better to shoot it out with the cops at 3:00, when drunk, or is it better to argue for exclusion and damages later?

You have all the earmarks of a troll, but let's see if you can accept this reasoning.

108 posted on 09/21/2011 6:59:33 AM PDT by MindBender26 (Forget AMEX. Remember your Glock 27: Never Leave Home Without It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson