“The MEDICAL studies done on the VAERS data has found NO deaths medically attributable to Gardasil yet.”
non-sequiter
We started, or at least were concerned, with Govt forcing people to use it, and pay for it. Are you defending Govt Forcing a foreign substance into another person? Even IF, as you claim, it can’t be Proven to be lethal?
Nice try, but since your post mentioned the 68 dead people at least two times, it’s clear that was your focus, until I told you that nobody died.
I’d be concerned if government was forcing it, but it isn’t, it wasn’t, and it never was going to. It was encouraging it, in this case by putting it on the required list, while leaving an opt-out for parents who cared.
Other states like Alaska encouraged it by advertising it on the government web site, recommending people take it, and offering it for free under a federal tax-payer funded program.
It’s a vaccine with relatively few side effects which will, if given universally, wipe out the cause of a good number of deaths each year. I can see why people are encouraging it.
Suppose two parents had a kid with a congenital heart defect. An operation might save his life. But the parents refuse the operation, so the kid is guaranteed to die. The operation is virtually 100% effective.
Would you support goverment stepping in and forcing the kid to have the operation, or do you believe the parents have an absolute right to decide what happens to their kid.
Does your answer change if I tell you the operation is 20% effective? or 5%?
If you support government stepping in to save the life of a child from parents who decide not to protect them, how do you distinguish that from parents not giving a life-saving vaccine? Is it different simply because the kids aren’t guaranteed to die without the vaccine, while in my example they were guaranteed to die?
What if there were 100 kids in a room. A man in the room has promised to kill 1 of the kids. The government can remove the kids from the room, and ensure that none of them die.
But 10 of the parents refuse to let the government take their kids out of the room. We know that 1 kid will die, but we don’t know if it is one of those 10 kids. It could be that none of them were the one that was picked to die. Now should we prohibit government action?