[Diogenesis]

Jim from C-Town" Complications amount to .375%. .0125% have died. ""

You give the LOWER LIMIT.

The 2006 population of women in the US per the census was 151,795,031.
Number of cervical cancer cases diagnosed in 2005 per the CDC was 11,999.
That means that 00.07904% of women were diagnosed with cervical cancer.
Number of deaths by cervical cancer in 2005 were 3,924.

You admit complications from Gardasil are AT LEAST .375%.
Death rate is .0125% .

Ergo, the death rate from Perry's and MERCK's Gardasil
is about the same as from cervical cancer.
PEOPLE SHOULD CHOOSE WISELY. NO MORE PERRY-CARE.

[thackney]

You are comparing the rates per immunization to the rate of cancer deaths per year.

Most women are living substantially more than one year. They are not getting the vaccination every year.

[Jim from C-Town]

Wrong. I am only giving the stated numbers in the article. According to the article NO ONE can show that Gardasil caused the deaths or any of the issues. It is also from a highly suspicious source.

The proved amount of deaths is ZERO. Also the drug is administered once, not every year. Every year women die from cervical cancer and a much larger percentage suffer from genital warts.

Once again correlation is not causation.

[arrogantsob]

Cancer deaths are DEFINITE.

“...the death rate from Perry's and MERCK’s Gardasil
is about the same as from cervical cancer.” This claim uses numbers which are HYPOTHETICALLY related to Gardasil. A girl gets the shot and gets killed by her mother's bo’ fren’ and her death goes into the “Deaths caused by Gardasil.

Your comparison is invalid, disingenuous, or deceptive.