>>My point, which you persistently either overloook or reject, is that the code is aimed at externalities, not at the subject matter being discussed on the property; religious meetings is used as an example, not as a particular restriction.
<<
WRONG. The code specifies “religious groups.”
That is NOT an externality.
Well, I did say that you persistently reject my contention as to what the code is aimed at. FWIW, I have the benefit of actually looking at the code (I linked it in a post to you), and also have the benefit of arguing use code before the local town.