[wbill]

It DOES prohibit government interfering with free speech and the right to assemble.

Ok, then, how about a Rock Concert next door to your house?

I agree with you that the law needs to be changed, I find the fact that it specifically mentions religion as offensive as you do.

I *do*, however, understand why such a zoning law exists.

[Do Not Make Fun Of His Ears]

>>I agree with you that the law needs to be changed, I find the fact that it specifically mentions religion as offensive as you do.<<

Then I don’t even know why you are disagreeing with me.

I never said traffic or noise statutes should be ignored. NEVER.

But the article points out that these were not the problem.

THE LAW IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL. PERIOD.

If we agree on that, that is my point.

[Do Not Make Fun Of His Ears]

>>Ok, then, how about a Rock Concert next door to your house?
<<

Would probably violate a CONSTITUTIONAL ban on loud noises in the neighborhood.

Prohibiting people from speaking about whatever they want (including religious speech) in their own homes, is UNconstitutional.