David Ramsay and John Jay would have disagreed. Get yourself an education.
Being born in the U.S. makes you a U.S. citizen, but not necessarily a natural born citizen. A natural born citizen requires US citizen parents at the time of birth. It is a matter of dual allegiance, which the Founding Fathers specifically put in the Constitution to prevent the following:
According to your contention that only birth in the U.S. is required, Anwar al-Awlaki is eligible to be President because he was born in New Mexico.
Al-Awlaki is the spiritual leader of al-Qaida in the Arabian peninsula, whose sermons at the Dar al-Hijrah Islamic Center in Falls Church, Virginia were attended by two hijackers who carried out the 9/11 attacks, Nawaf al-Hamzi and Hani Hanjour.
Likewise, you believe that Fort Hood shooter and al-Awlaki disciple Nidal Malik Hasan is eligible to be President because he was born in Virginia.
“Rubio was born in the US. That is all that is required.”
What, exactly, is the difference then between a “citizen” and a “natural born citizen”?
“Rubio was born in the US. That is all that is required.
Adding in his parents birthplace is not a qualifying issue.”
His parents’ citizenship at the time of his birth is the qualifying issue, and they were NOT citizens at that time.
JC