To: Sola Veritas; All; Jim Robinson
Are you certain this post is directed to me? I agree with this post and your prior one.
When I posted re 'conflating politics with science' (#72), I was cc'ing you as a courtesy while directing my post to Jim from C-Town whose posts have been all over the place regarding the science behind Gardasil, seems to have a problem with patients and informed consent, and has been arguing for nanny state intervention regarding Gardasil which you accurately portrayed as:
"Vaccinating preteen girls that may be exposed to a virus that may cause them cancer later in life IS NOT a matter of immediate public health. Using your Nanny-State reasoning, like I have stated, we may as well ban tobacco and alcohol....you would save many more lives than genital warts or cervical cancer will take" .
In fact I pointed out to Jim from C-Town in my post #57, the same kind of nanny state reasoning would also ban tobacco, sodas, fatty foods.
110 posted on
09/20/2011 6:13:33 AM PDT by
algernonpj
(He who pays the piper . . .)
To: algernonpj
“When I posted re ‘conflating politics with science’ (#72), I was cc’ing you as a courtesy”
My apology...I thought you were zapping me. I often get confused and attack in the wrong direction! :-)
116 posted on
09/20/2011 1:42:21 PM PDT by
Sola Veritas
(Trying to speak truth - not always with the best grammar or spelling)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson