Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MontaniSemperLiberi

Why would I comment on the costs of Medicare when my point was and is about the salutary effect ( borrowing from the NBER) effect Part D has had on medical costs of medicare? I mentioned nothing about the total costs of medicare

if that is the point YOU wish to make you can make it yourself


45 posted on 09/18/2011 1:04:04 PM PDT by RWGinger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies ]


To: RWGinger

Let us review, shall we?

RWG: for every $1.00 spent on prescriptions with part d save over $2.00 in medicare costs

MSL: ‘Have Medicare cots come down? Have they even stopped going up as much?”

RSG: “Why would I comment on the costs of Medicare when my point was and is about the salutary effect”

If part D has a “salutary effect” one would expect total medicare costs to at least slow their increase if not stop. Despite the study, they haven’t. Medicare costs go up and up.

I have no particular problem with Medicare part D except is is one of many spending increases that the Democrats and Republicans have enacted since 2001 that has driven us under. If we want part D, where are the medicare taxes to support it? If we don’t want to pay for it then why are we doing it?


48 posted on 09/18/2011 1:30:40 PM PDT by MontaniSemperLiberi (Moutaineers are Always Free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson