Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

GOP opponents are hitting Perry where it helps
Corpus Christi Caller Times ^ | September 18, 2011 | Editorial Board

Posted on 09/18/2011 1:29:25 AM PDT by Cincinatus' Wife

CORPUS CHRISTI — Gov. Rick Perry is under attack for trying to prevent a cancer whose yearly death toll exceeds this nation’s 9/11 losses by more than a thousand. On this issue, we are compelled to defend him — an unfamiliar role — and to wonder whether the master politician hand-picked his attackers.

We speak, of course, of the other Republican presidential candidates and their assault on Perry’s 2007 executive order that all sixth-grade girls be vaccinated against HPV, a sexually transmitted virus that causes cervical cancer and genital warts. The order was soon overturned in a hail of criticism that it usurped parental control (though it included an opt-out), encouraged promiscuity and returned a favor to Perry contributor Merck.

Texans had pretty much put this episode behind them — even the ones who were most angry about it, perhaps because those predisposed to anger on this issue are predisposed to back Perry on most others. But along came the Republican presidential primary campaign, then later came Perry into that campaign after an extended theatrical hemming and hawing, only to snatch instant frontrunner-hood. The HPV issue is the best opportunity for the other candidates, especially extreme-right Michele Bachmann and Rick Santorum, to nip at Perry’s heels.

The governor’s connection to Merck and to the lobbyist who sought his support is undeniable. Perry’s opponents can charge cronyism with a degree of accuracy. He responded to a pitch for a commercial product, delivered by someone who had fast-track access to him. But since the product’s widespread use would be in the public’s best interest, it appears that Perry has chosen his cronies wisely.

As for the notion that the HPV vaccine would promote promiscuity, it’s hard to imagine a teenager deciding to have sex because she was vaccinated against HPV, or deciding against it because she hasn’t been.

Bachmann took it a step further, suggesting that the vaccine can cause mental retardation. She bases this on her account of a weeping mother telling her it happened to her daughter. The American Academy of Pediatrics responded that the HPV vaccine is safe and doesn’t cause mental retardation, based on science.

Now Perry is in the unfamiliar position of having both science and us on his side. He has said, repeatedly, that his method was wrong but his purpose — preventing cancer and saving lives — was right.

The attacks on Perry play well before a right-wing audience focused on limited-government principles. When the focus shifts to daughters — which at some point it will — this family-first audience will stop paying only lip service to putting family first, even if it means joining a science-believing audience on this one issue.

The HPV attacks, while appearing to hurt Perry’s chances of winning the nomination, will do much to dispel concerns that he’s too far right to win the general election. We have to wonder if Bachmann is part of a plan to enhance Perry’s electability.

His most viable opponent, Mitt Romney, did his part to help that cause.

While Romney agreed that Perry should have gone about the HPV issue differently, “I think his heart was in the right place.” This confirms the disputable theory that Perry has a heart. No other issue addressed by Perry thus far in the campaign suggests that he does. His nonchalant comment about the many executions under his watch, chillingly applauded during the California debate, suggested that he doesn’t.

So, in the long run, Perry’s HPV mistake will do him more good than harm. He looks manly, defiant and compassionate defending it. It lures people into his corner who usually aren’t, including us, and ultimately won’t chase away those who usually are.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cancervaccine; cervicalcancer; gardasil4u; gardasilperry; hpv; mandatebyperry; perry2012; rickperry; rinorick
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-220 last
To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus
Its funny that so many on here think Perry is a RINO quasi-socialist like Obama. Because of Gardasil, immigration, and a few other items.

But the national media is painting him as an absolute far right RADICAL - incapable of winning in the general election.

I'm starting to tune everyone out and lose interest in a hurry. Not in Perry, in dumbass people.

201 posted on 09/18/2011 5:12:22 PM PDT by mikhailovich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: GOPyouth
 
 
"Angelo Mozilo, thank you"
--Governor Ricardo Perry
http://governor.state.tx.us/news/speech/10202/
 
 

202 posted on 09/18/2011 5:57:18 PM PDT by LomanBill (Animals! The DemocRats blew up the windmill with an Acorn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: lonestar

>>You ashamed of where you live?

Nah, unlike drunken loudmouthed Texicans who brag about how unenlightened they think the Declaration of Independence's architect is --- I'm proud to be an American.

 

203 posted on 09/18/2011 6:02:16 PM PDT by LomanBill (Animals! The DemocRats blew up the windmill with an Acorn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: GOPyouth

{primate yawwwwn}

So now that you’re done with your semantic Kabuki dance — answer the question:

When did Governor Perry’s administration discover it was an error to give Angelo Mozilo’s predatory enterprise 20 million dollars; and WHAT did his administration do about correcting that error?


204 posted on 09/18/2011 6:07:57 PM PDT by LomanBill (Animals! The DemocRats blew up the windmill with an Acorn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: LomanBill

You’re pathetic!


205 posted on 09/18/2011 6:29:12 PM PDT by lonestar (It takes a village of idiots to elect a village idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 203 | View Replies]

To: lonestar
I'm glad you think so.

Here's your state-sponsored "Enterprise" fithcal conthervativism back at ya...



NO SALE.
206 posted on 09/18/2011 6:43:18 PM PDT by LomanBill (Animals! The DemocRats blew up the windmill with an Acorn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 205 | View Replies]

To: LomanBill

Your backyard.


207 posted on 09/18/2011 6:45:09 PM PDT by lonestar (It takes a village of idiots to elect a village idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: lonestar

>>Your backyard.

What about it?


208 posted on 09/18/2011 6:59:57 PM PDT by LomanBill (Animals! The DemocRats blew up the windmill with an Acorn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 207 | View Replies]

To: LomanBill

Picture of...your backyard. LOl!


209 posted on 09/18/2011 7:02:52 PM PDT by lonestar (It takes a village of idiots to elect a village idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: lonestar

Uhuh. A yard with a picture of a Trojan Log Cabin being returned upon its fithcally conthervative makers, air mail.

What you gonna try next --- a large wooden Rhinocerous?



NO SALE.

210 posted on 09/18/2011 7:17:28 PM PDT by LomanBill (Animals! The DemocRats blew up the windmill with an Acorn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 209 | View Replies]

To: LomanBill
What you gonna try next --- a large wooden Rhinocerous?

Who squealed?!

211 posted on 09/18/2011 8:04:32 PM PDT by lonestar (It takes a village of idiots to elect a village idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 210 | View Replies]

To: Cincinatus' Wife

Agree, too many ?erks on this & border response


212 posted on 09/18/2011 8:31:52 PM PDT by TweetEBird007
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll
Now do you understand?

No. Why don't you explain it to me again, in greater detail?

213 posted on 09/19/2011 6:39:32 AM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus ("A gentleman considers what is just; a small man considers what is expedient.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Outlaw Woman
Link here.

Before you complain about the source, keep in mind a couple of things:

1) The attacks on Perry (and presumably, any other Republican who would at some point become the frontrunner) come from leftie sources as well (i.e. MSM and its hangers-on).

2) The Left has this waiting in the wings, and it will have to be dealt with if and when SARAH! gets into the race. Naysaying its source won't make it go away, nor does it negate the essential veracity of the story.

214 posted on 09/19/2011 6:42:49 AM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus ("A gentleman considers what is just; a small man considers what is expedient.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: mikhailovich
I'm starting to tune everyone out and lose interest in a hurry. Not in Perry, in dumbass people.

I am in total agreement.

215 posted on 09/19/2011 6:44:29 AM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus ("A gentleman considers what is just; a small man considers what is expedient.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 201 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

Thank you


216 posted on 09/19/2011 6:57:02 AM PDT by Outlaw Woman (Attention: Liberals & RINOS: We The People are coming for YOU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: Outlaw Woman

You are welcome.

FWIW, the whole claim may end up to be nothing more than Joe McGinniss-style wish fulfillment, but we need to be ready for it, just in case.


217 posted on 09/19/2011 8:29:26 AM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus ("A gentleman considers what is just; a small man considers what is expedient.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 216 | View Replies]

To: LomanBill
>>Your backyard.

What about it?

LomanBill, I just want to compliment you on how tidy and neatly trimmed your back yard is. That turf almost looks like it was professionally installed, and you've obviously invested quite a bit into that sprinkler system. Kudos!

218 posted on 09/19/2011 8:37:13 AM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus ("A gentleman considers what is just; a small man considers what is expedient.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies]

To: Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus

{shrug} “It’s only a model”, but thanks anyhow.


219 posted on 09/19/2011 5:58:27 PM PDT by LomanBill (Animals! The DemocRats blew up the windmill with an Acorn!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 218 | View Replies]

To: txrangerette

You explain it better than Perry did. You should have been on the stage.


220 posted on 09/25/2011 4:50:11 AM PDT by heye2monn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-220 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson