Replies

I’ll see your three questions and anti-raise you two questions.

1 question to you:

1. Has Sarah Palin said she is running?

If you cannot answer YES to any of the above questions — well, actually, just one question ... then you cannot say Sarah is running.

Also, regarding the Reagan and Nixon examples ... they may be invalid. May I presume the filing deadlines might be different, 42 and 32 years later, respectively?

Regardless, what’s the point of worrying about it, yea or nay, until the deadline passes or Palin provides a definitive answer.

All I know is Palin would be better than Obama. And so would Perry, Romney, Bachman, Cain, Gingrich, Santorum and every declared GOP candidate — with the exception of Paul.

-George

Correct. We will not know Palin is running until she tells us. On the other hand, we will not know that she is NOT running until one of those original questions switch to a YES answer.

Agree with you that all the candidates (aside from Paul) would be better than Obama. Actually I want to say that Paul would be better than Obama too but I can't get around his position that all the countries in the Middle East should be allowed to develop and possess nuclear weapons and implying that Bin Laden had valid reasons for 9/11 attacks (because U.S. was occupying Middle East nations).