Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Red Badger

I’m not sure what is most pathetic - that a nation would attempt such a laughable project or that a magazine entitled “MIT Technology Review” would bother to cover it(???)


38 posted on 09/17/2011 8:57:44 AM PDT by The Duke
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: The Duke
I’m not sure what is most pathetic - that a nation would attempt such a laughable project or that a magazine entitled “MIT Technology Review” would bother to cover it

MIT Technology Review is not peer reviewed and does not pretend to be, but it is generally good (if a bit speculative on occasion). The choice surprised me as well. Many of the technical issues mentioned are manageable, even lifting to one kilometer, if it is done in stages, which is not mentioned in the article but is a reasonable accommodation. If they have booster pumps every twenty, fifty, or one hundred feet, the pressures are much more plausible. Of course there is the pump weight issue, but they can afford a grand new DARPA project in a good cause. Perhaps MHD pumps powered by solar panels on the balloon would suffice

60 posted on 09/17/2011 12:28:35 PM PDT by Pollster1 (Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson