It did take some time after the Texas legislature removed the king's crown for him to get it that he did NOT have the sole power to mandate anybody to purchase that product.
IT does not matter one bit that everyone who bought health insurance whether or not they ever got the vaccine was going to be forced to pay higher premiums so the some could get the vaccination. There was NO informed consent to the many when who were to be forced to pay for the few to receive government vaccines. See some people are more special than the rest, get out your check book politics.
Wonder how many vaccinations could have been handed out had Merck not been out buying up politicians? This to me goes to the 'core' of real concern about the plague of sexually transmitted cancer. They did spend quite a pot of gold to get elected official to mandate/tax uninformed consumers of health insurance. But I digress this was a 'salvation' movement and we cannot question well paid for good intentions. Liberals in TEA PARTY costumes.
This kind of government operation is 'bad' if you are an establishment liberal, but establishment republicans get praised for taxation/mandates if it is for the better good. You can be comforted that today in Iowa, Governor Perry was asking people to 'trust him', so the salvation movement is gaining ground.
I still like Bachmann, and I find great irony in her getting dragged through the proverbial mud because she repeated what an audience member told her after the debate. See it was ok for king Perry to hold court with 'cancer' victims after the legislature handed him is crown. But Bachmann is suppose to sit down shut up and bend down to king Perry. NOT happening in my little neck of the world.
“because she repeated what an audience member told her after the debate.”
Then the Perry supporters act as if Bachmann said it, when Bachmann was only repeating what a woman told her.
It’s what the Dems do, say a lie over and over, and it becomes the truth.