The crusading pioneer of 12 year old girl’s took money from a company that produces and sales the same mental retardation producing vaccine. Moral high ground, I think not.
And just so happens to be a competitor of the one company that didn’t donate to her campaign. Hey, if she can toss out wild accussation with no substantiation then we can all speculate about her motives and if she was bought off to go after one of their competitors. That does seem to be all some Freepers care about these days. Not proof certainly...just association is enough to indict.
Unlike the Governor of Texas, she did not mandate, without the approval of the People's representatives, or the parents of these children, the injection of a vaccine into any young girl, after being lobbied by a former aide, who was then an agent of the company which produced that vaccine, and which stood to profit by her actions.
How can you possibly defend Governor Perry's actions in this matter?