To: smoothsailing
Delaying the inevitable. Five times before, the SC order a new sentence for the same reason. All 5 times a new Texas jury gave another death sentence. This guy will be put to death.
To: KingKongCobra
If so, it will be in a proceeding that is kept sterile of racial references.
9 posted on
09/15/2011 7:19:09 PM PDT by
HiTech RedNeck
(There's gonna be a Redneck Revolution! (See my freep page) [rednecks come in many colors])
To: KingKongCobra
I’ve often thought that perps who laugh at their victims should be denied the right to a last meal and a final statement. Just get a volunteer guard to walk into their cell at 6 a.m. every morning for a week or so and cold cock the bastard. One day, there will be a live round in the chamber, but the perp will never know when.
14 posted on
09/15/2011 7:28:44 PM PDT by
Vigilanteman
(Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
To: KingKongCobra
“Delaying the inevitable.”
Absolutely correct. There was precedence set with five other cases because an “expert witness” brought in racism.
The facts remain the same. I don’t believe a new sentencing jury will find any other verdict.
The only thing I am confused about is that the news reported it was the Texas SC..not the US SC.
25 posted on
09/15/2011 8:34:00 PM PDT by
berdie
To: KingKongCobra
"Delaying the inevitable. Five times before, the SC order a new sentence for the same reason. All 5 times a new Texas jury gave another death sentence. This guy will be put to death. "Possibly, but only after squandering more taxpayer money on his defense, the prosecution, and feeding and housing him.
46 posted on
09/16/2011 9:23:17 AM PDT by
ronnyquest
(I spent 20 years in the Army fighting the enemies of freedom only to see fascism elected at home.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson