[ari-freedom]

from CDC link you cited:

In the 32 reports confirmed, there was no unusual pattern or clustering to the deaths that would suggest that they were caused by the vaccine and some reports indicated a cause of death unrelated to vaccination.

[Diogenesis]

32 reports? How selective a cherry picker you are.

First, grasshopper, this list is a LOWER LIMIT.

Second, the serious problems (e.g. cancers induced) will
show up LATER (usual latency is 7 to 20 years).

Third, there were 18,727 reports of adverse events.

Four, there were 68 VAERS reports of death.

Fifth, did the RINO Perry warn the 6th graders
they might die?

Six, .... or does he just brag (and lie) that
he PREVENTS CANCER?

[muawiyah]

The problem is that the CONCLUSION is based on the opinion of the person running the study. Merck itself says "Out of the entire study population (25,274 subjects), only 0.05% of the reported serious systemic adverse reactions were judged to be vaccine related by the study investigator."

Merck has a bad track record here when it comes to anesthetics. Several years back their study investigator was found to have fraudulently concocted his evaluations of Merck's anesthetics including Versed ~ a very commonly used sedative. As my doctor put it "gee whiz, an overdose turns your brain to jelly. WOW!!"

De novo, NO ONE trusts Merck per se when it comes to these studies. Doesn't mean they make bad drugs ~ but sometimes they do ~ their quality control systems have been easily sidetracked by individuals with low ethical standards.