[allmendream]

And if we were never in Afghanistan we wouldn't have had the opportunity to “take out” Bin Lauden.

If the American people were as cowardly and ignorant as Ron Paul and his supporters we would have, as Osama expected, retreated from our involvement in the world rather than toppling the government that supported Osama, and occupying it militarily giving us the reach to take him out in Pakistan.

Luckily for the world the rest of the USA isn't as ignorant and cowardly as Ron Paul supporters.

[dragnet2]

Ya don't need to occupy entire countries, for *years* or spend multiple trillions of American treasure, to take out Muslim gangsters. In fact, if those who created these destructive intrusive foreign policies, opted not to fight politically correct, "compassionate" wars, at the expense of American lives, we'd still have some respect in this world.

It was so bad, Bush's so called Homeland Security Chief Chertoff, had people wandering around the inside of his private residence, who entered the country illegally...All during wartime, while our own borders became a national security time bomb, with millions flooding into the U.S. illegally....during wartime. This is a farce.

We'll put you down for continuing these country killing, politically correct foreign policies.

[Allegra]

And if we were never in Afghanistan we wouldn't have had the opportunity to “take out” Bin Laden.

Notice how Paul and his Paultards get all hyped up over defense costs, but you rarely hear them complaining about the (significanlty higher) costs for the welfare/entitlement programs or other blatantly wasteful, abusive spending?

The Paul Cult is Code Pinkishly obsessed with its anti-military, anti-defense agenda.

As an aside, Paul sounds like a grouchy old coot yelling at kids on his lawn when he launches into his anti-war screeds in the debates.