Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NOM RELEASES "FLASH" SURVEY IN NY-9 - WEPRIN VOTE FOR GAY MARRIAGE COST HIM SEAT IN CONGRESS
NOM Blog ^ | September 14, 2011 | National Organization for Marriage

Posted on 09/14/2011 10:09:27 PM PDT by Antoninus

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last
Attention GOP -- Even Democrats don't want gay "marriage." It's a wedge issue that, if used correctly, can shake loose a lot of Democrat seats. Please stop following the elites and the media on this subject. Homosexual marriage is not popular and never will be!
1 posted on 09/14/2011 10:09:37 PM PDT by Antoninus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: wagglebee; little jeremiah
The National Organization for Marriage deserves major kudos for what went down last night. They are an effective conservative organization that deserves our support.

National Organization for Marriage
2 posted on 09/14/2011 10:12:31 PM PDT by Antoninus (Nothing that offends God can possibly be a legitimate right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

sample size too small to be significant


3 posted on 09/14/2011 10:13:36 PM PDT by icanhasbailout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
"Even Democrats don't want gay "marriage.""

No, it means their constituents need more education

4 posted on 09/14/2011 10:14:14 PM PDT by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus
Turner is pro traditional marriage and pro life and he won in deep blue NYC.

Yet we have folks on this board who think that we should take a pass or make a truce on social issues.

This is exibit "A" why that strategy sucks.

5 posted on 09/14/2011 10:16:12 PM PDT by FreeReign
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

So a self-serving survey by the National Organization for Marriage lets Obama and Schumer off the hook. What a nice gift for the press corps.


6 posted on 09/14/2011 10:18:44 PM PDT by tlb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

Even worse, he tried to justify his vote in favor of gay marriage on the grounds that it was consistent with the teachings of his religion. Which is obviously nuts and infuriated his coreligionists.


7 posted on 09/14/2011 10:18:56 PM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tlb
So a self-serving survey by the National Organization for Marriage lets Obama and Schumer off the hook. What a nice gift for the press corps.

LOL. You can look at it that way if you want. The fact of the matter is that NOM did a lot of heavy lifting in terms of direct mail in that race. Folks may be down on Obama, but the gay "marriage" thing is fresh in their minds in NY.
8 posted on 09/14/2011 10:21:45 PM PDT by Antoninus (Nothing that offends God can possibly be a legitimate right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign
This is exibit "A" why that strategy sucks.

The people who want a "truce" on social issues are almost always social liberals. And if you think you can trust a social liberal to be a fiscal conservative, you're nuts.
9 posted on 09/14/2011 10:23:01 PM PDT by Antoninus (Nothing that offends God can possibly be a legitimate right.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: DManA

Sounds like a real odd ball. Modern Orthodoxy is one of the last places you’d expect to hear something like this. (The more liberal arms of the American synagogue have already plunged themselves into this sewer.)


10 posted on 09/14/2011 10:23:30 PM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (There's gonna be a Redneck Revolution! (See my freep page) [rednecks come in many colors])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

Or trust that they really want a truce.

They’ll take a “truce” to consolidate their gains and, when things have settled down, they’ll commence tearing apart the social fabric.


11 posted on 09/14/2011 10:50:34 PM PDT by Jonty30
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

As someone here said in a prior post “ erections have consequences


12 posted on 09/14/2011 10:52:51 PM PDT by woodenickel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #13 Removed by Moderator

To: icanhasbailout

Democrats take note: Support Gay Marriage and end your political career. Better have another job in your back pocket if you back these un-popular acts.


14 posted on 09/14/2011 10:57:07 PM PDT by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

I hope those gay marriage supporting traitor RINOs in the NY senate pay very close attention. If they were hoping for democratic cover next election, they should remember, dems can’t even protect themselves. How are they going to provide cover for you backstabbers?

Hopefully November 2012 will get rid of democrats and any reach across the aisle RINOs up for re-election. Maybe the RINOs, elites, beltway boys will take notice and quit trying to push their favorite RINO’s on us.


15 posted on 09/14/2011 11:05:46 PM PDT by Waryone (RINOs, Elites, and Socialists - on the endangered list, soon to become extinct.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

Truth. To be a social liberal is to be a fiscal liberal in the long run. After all, the taxpayers end up being the ones forced to pay for the consequences and results of social liberalism in society.


16 posted on 09/14/2011 11:15:13 PM PDT by ReformationFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Yehuda

It is an opportunity. White Southerners didn’t become Republican overnight.


17 posted on 09/14/2011 11:15:23 PM PDT by rmlew ("Mosques are our barracks, minarets our bayonets, domes our helmets, the believers our soldiers.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Antoninus

I’m happy to know that more NYers have better morals than I originally thought.


18 posted on 09/14/2011 11:25:03 PM PDT by Sun (Pray that God sends us good leaders. Please say a prayer now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: icanhasbailout

Assuming that they did their best to maintain randomness of the sample, IMO, n= 250 should be fine. The number of people voted on Tuesday was about 60,000. So, a bit below 0.5%. Most sample size for presidential poll usually are much lower than that (in terms of percentage).


19 posted on 09/14/2011 11:41:14 PM PDT by paudio (The 0bama Downgrade Part Two (a possible sequel to the current horror movie))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Steve Van Doorn

No, it means they don’t want homosexual marriage. The term “education” used in this instance is a euphemism for the ongoing effort by some to exert social pressure and force society into submission on this.


20 posted on 09/15/2011 12:11:23 AM PDT by Obadiah (Okay, so what's the speed of dark?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson