Posted on 09/14/2011 5:38:43 PM PDT by RobinMasters
Not only are major papers running headlines about the site becoming a laughingstock, even respected liberals are admitting that they would have flipped out had Bush tried something similar. Place your bets: How much longer can the PR beating go on before someone throws in the towel? Ace thinks it’ll be gone — or at least substantially overhauled to rid it of the “snazzy Gestapo color scheme” — by 6 p.m. ET. I’m thinking they’re going to stick with it for the long haul for the reason MKH gives here:
Design regression from Fight the Smears to #AttackWatch is metaphor for Obama 08 vs. 12. Same product, subtract style, sprinkle desperation.
Compare and contrast. We’re more than a year away from election day and it’s already axiomatic that this will be the nastiest campaign in recent memory — and the worse the economy is, the nastier it’ll be on the White House’s end. Why pretend otherwise by adding rainbows and unicorns to AttackWatch.com now? They should keep the site as is and embrace the new scorched-earth vision of “Hope” and “Change.” Or better yet, embellish the motif. How about a grainy photo of Joe Biden in a balaclava to add “atmosphere”?
(Excerpt) Read more at hotair.com ...
I wonder if they were Diebold ATMs?
Went over to DU a couple hours ago to see what they had to say. Not a word about this over there.
Yes, some of my FB friends are a bit upset with me. Oh well.
Now, that looks familiar...
Obama doubles down on dumb. Just watch.
Apparently an ‘attack’ occurs whenever someone who is not aligned with Obama speaks. If Rick Perry were to remark, “Nice weather today”, he would be denounced as a climate change denier.
What a scam. Did they tell you that “7 people were searching for you right now”? LOL.
I read some of the postings today and they were hilarious. I love seeing Obama being made a fool of.
“liberals really cannot stand is someone laughing at them.”
Alinsky rule #5
Dear #attackwatch: Orwell’s 1984 was a cautionary tale, not an instruction manual.
I thought that was priceless.
The pure black background and stark lettering gives it such an ominous and dangerous aura. Why would they want to associated such images with Obama, who once surrounded himself with the mantle of hope, goodness, peace and light?
My thinking is that this is part desperation, but also in part the logical conclusion of seducing, then warping the weak-minded into fanatical followers.
I was talking about attackwatch. You can’t sign on until you give them money. The things a campaign money tool.
I was still able to report a “thoughtcrime”, at least it seemed to take it before going to the donate page.
I don’t twitter, but I logged into it on your suggestion. Belly hurting comments!
You are definitely channeling your inner Greg.
fuzislippers Fuzzy Slippers
Dear #attackwatch my neighbor won’t give me all her money even though she makes more than me. Look into this please.
My favorite: “How many times do I have to turn in my parents to get the Hitler Youth knife?” BTT
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.