"People may wonder what the urgency is in addressing these cancers, but the numbers are staggering," said Jan Coebergh. (...) But the study - by the Institute of Health Metrics and Evaluation - found that breast cancer kills 425,000 women a year while cervical cancer takes 200,000 lives. (...) The study also found that cervical cancer cases increased from 378,000 in 1980 to about 454,000 cases in 2010, with most of those cases in developing countries.http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-504763_162-20106719-10391704.html
I think it's inappropriate to downplay the seriousness of cervical cancer for the purposes of a political discussion.
Those that die of cervical cancer are usually women who did not get regular pap smears."
I believe you fail to understand that Hispanics are a majority in Texas. Hispanics in Texas have both an extremely high teen-pregnancy rate and poverty rate. Taken together, those rates indicate that a significant majority is at risk of contracting HPV and is unlikely to receive regular screening.
Perry's EO was the wrong way to address the situation, but that doesn't change the seriousness of the situation itself.
The vaccination series is much cheaper than the treatment.
The question Perry will have to answer if he is the nomineee.