I believe there is a societal benefit to not having people die on the street, that MAY rise to the level of a legitimate government purpose. But it’s not something I’d fight for, more something I wouldn’t object to as part of a plan to repeal Obamacare.
On the other hand, if we get strict about it, there’s a lot of stuff that needs to be stopped that we’ll never get any congress to vote to stop.
Sounds like you are an undecided moderate. Your post makes no sense. You wouldn’t fight to have the government keep people from dying in the streets. Yet you wouldn’t mind if when repealing Obama care there is a plan for government to keep people from dying in the streets? Explain that please.
Do you believe we live in a country that will not take care its sick unless compelled to do so via government force?
Why do so many people on this thread seem to think that unless we are forced to pay for the care of other people they will die in the streets?