Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Cincinatus' Wife
Quoted from the article in your post:

"When first approved in late 2009, Gardasil appeared to offer little to boys aside from a selfless opportunity to curb the sexual transmission of HPV to future partners."

So I ask again, if the purpose of the legislation was to halt the spread of HPV, why didn't he require it for boys?

121 posted on 09/13/2011 9:00:15 AM PDT by anonsquared
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies ]


To: anonsquared

Why didn’t he? Maybe it would have been too obvious an invitation to the little would-be studs???


125 posted on 09/13/2011 9:01:18 AM PDT by HiTech RedNeck (There's gonna be a Redneck Revolution! (See my freep page) [rednecks come in many colors])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies ]

To: anonsquared
When first approved in late 2009

Because he wrote the order in 2007.

150 posted on 09/13/2011 9:08:58 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson