Posted on 09/12/2011 4:19:55 AM PDT by VU4G10
Republican presidential candidate Rick Perry has taken the wind out of fellow candidate Michele Bachmanns sails ever since he entered the race Aug. 13. Now the Minnesota congresswoman is ready to go back at the Texas governor during a candidates debate in Tampa, Fla., Monday, The Washington Examiner reports.
Bachmann is poised to attack Perry over his comments that Social Security is a monstrous lie and a Ponzi scheme.
A Bachmann adviser told The Examiner: "Bernie Madoff deals with Ponzi schemes, not the grandparents of America. Clearly she feels differently about the value of Social Security than Gov. Perry does. She believes Social Security needs to be saved, that it's an important safety net for Americans who have paid into it all their lives."
Perrys view is clearly not something that's going to sit well with the people of Florida and Iowa and South Carolina and many of the early states, where there is a large population of seniors who rely heavily on Social Security. the adviser said. For [Perry] to scare them is wrong."
And Bachmann isn't stopping there. Keep Conservatives United, a Super PAC supporting her is set to start a radio ad attacking Perry for his immigration stance. The ad is scheduled to air during conservative talk radio shows in South Carolina starting Tuesday, The Hill reports.
The ad portrays Bachmann as tough on illegal immigration whileblasting Perry for failing to curb it during his stint as Texas governor.
"Michele Bachmann believes employers should be required to check the legal status of people they hire with E-Verify," the ad says. "Perry doesn't, so illegals take jobs."
(Excerpt) Read more at newsmax.com ...
Ping!
The invasion will not stop until not only the borders are secured but illegals are also denied both social services and employment.
You must go after illegals where ever you find them, whether that is at the borders, where they receive government services or at places of employment.
From its duty to control aliens in this country, the government also incurs the duty to control their employment in the US which obviously involves controlling employers that would illegally employ them.
The "inconvenience" argument is too insignificant to be anything but a smoke screen for knowingly aiding and abetting illegal aliens and their invasion.
I have the same reaction to "American" businesses that want to employ 3rd world illegal aliens, as I have to "American" clergy who want to minister to 3rd world illegal aliens: Go live in the 3rd world and do it; the rest of America doesn't want you to bring the 3rd world - and 3rd world living conditions - here for the sake of monetary business (or sanctimonious clerical) profit.
Take it up with the Feds.
States, especially border states, no longer have the final say in regards to National Guard deployment. The FedGov/POTUS do.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.